1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ilya [14]
3 years ago
7

water flows horizontally from a hose that is 3m above the ground. the water lands 7.2m to the right of the hose . how long does

it take the water to reach the ground?
Physics
2 answers:
Sidana [21]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

0.782 s

Explanation:

The water flows horizontally from the hose, so its initial vertical velocity is 0.

Given:

y₀ = 3 m

y = 0 m

v₀ = 0 m/s

a = -9.8 m/s²

Find: t

y = y₀ + v₀ t + ½ at²

0 m = 3 m + (0 m/s) t + ½ (-9.8 m/s²) t²

t = 0.782 s

Round as needed.

lora16 [44]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

0.782 seconds

Explanation:

Water flows horizontally from a hose that is 3m above the ground. The water lands 7.2m to the right of the hose. Therefore, it will take 0.782 seconds for the water to reach the ground. We know this because, the water flows sideways in the hose, therefore, making its vertical velocity 0.

You might be interested in
Number of complete 90.9 MHz radio waves over a 1.50 km distance
zimovet [89]
You could answer this right away IF you knew the length of each wave, right ?

Well,  Wavelength = (speed) / (frequency).

Speed = 3 x 10⁸ m/s  (the speed of light)
and
Frequency = 90.9 x 10⁶ Hertz.

So the length of each wave is  3 x 10⁸ / 90.9 x 10⁶  meters.

To answer the question, see how many pieces you have to cut
that 1.5 km into, in order for each piece to be 1 wavelength. 
It'll be

(1,500 meters) divided by (3 x 10⁸ meters/sec) / (90.9 x 10⁶ Hz)

To divide by a fraction, flip the fraction and then multiply:

(1500 meters) times (90.9 x 10⁶ Hz)/(3 x 10⁸ meters/sec)

=   454.5
5 0
3 years ago
How much heat is absorbed by 60g of copper when it is heated from 20°C to 80°C
nexus9112 [7]

Answer:

I HOPE THIS IS CORRECT

Explanation:

It is heated from 20°C to 80°C. We need to find the heat absorbed. It can be given by the formula as follows : So, 1386 J of heat is absorbed.

7 0
2 years ago
You toss a tennis ball straight upward. At the moment it leaves your hand it is at a height of 1.5 m above the ground, and it is
ollegr [7]

My answer was incorrect, please disregard.

4 0
2 years ago
If a star with an absolute magnitude of -5 has an apparent magnitude of +5 ,then its distance is
klio [65]
You asked a question.  I'm about to answer it. 
Sadly, I can almost guarantee that you won't understand the solution. 
This realization grieves me, but there is little I can do to change it. 
My explanation will be the best of which I'm capable.


Here are the Physics facts I'll use in the solution:

-- "Apparent magnitude" means how bright the star appears to us.

-- "Absolute magnitude" means the how bright the star WOULD appear
if it were located 32.6 light years from us (10 parsecs).

-- A change of 5 magnitudes means a 100 times change in brightness,
so each magnitude means brightness is multiplied or divided by  ⁵√100 .
That's about  2.512... .  

-- Increasing magnitude means dimmer.
Decreasing magnitude means brighter.
+5 is 10 magnitudes dimmer than -5 .

-- Apparent brightness is inversely proportional to the square
of the distance from the source (just like gravity, sound, and
the force between charges).

That's all the Physics.  The rest of the solution is just arithmetic.
____________________________________________________

-- The star in the question would appear M(-5) at a distance of
32.6 light years. 

-- It actually appears as a M(+5).  That's 10 magnitudes dimmer than M(-5),
because of being farther away than 32.6 light years.

-- 10 magnitudes dimmer is ( ⁵√100)⁻¹⁰ = (100)^(-2) .

-- But brightness varies as the inverse square of distance,
so that exponent is (negative double) the ratio of the distances,
and the actual distance to the star is

(32.6) · (100)^(1) light years

= (32.6) · (100) light years

=  approx.  3,260 light years .   (roughly 1,000 parsecs)


I'll have to confess that I haven't done one of these calculations
in over 50 years, and I'm not really that confident in my result.
If somebody's health or safety depended on it, or the success of
a space mission, then I'd be strongly recommending that you get
a second opinion.
But, quite frankly, I do feel that mine is worth the 5 points.
6 0
2 years ago
Name the type of simple machine: A ramp on the back of a moving van.
Mrac [35]
C) an inclined plane 
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • two arrows are fired horizontally with the same speed of 30.0 m/s. Each arrow has a mass of 0.100kg. One is fired due east and t
    11·2 answers
  • Classes are canceled due to snow, so you take advantage of the extra time to conduct some physics experiments. You fasten a larg
    13·1 answer
  • If a species can adapt to a changing environment, or ____, its descendants will survive.
    5·1 answer
  • The formulas used to analyze the horizontal and vertical motion of projectiles launched at an angle involve the use of which fun
    8·2 answers
  • An automobile fuel tank is filled to the brim with 45 L of gasoline (12 gal) at 10°C. Immediately afterward, the vehicle is park
    7·1 answer
  • I WILL MARK BRAINLIEST TO WHOEVER GETS THIS CORRECT
    7·2 answers
  • A 69.5-kg person throws a 0.0475-kg snowball forward with a ground speed of 31.5 m/s. A second person, with a mass of 57.5 kg, c
    15·1 answer
  • HELP THIS IS DUE TODAY PLEASE
    14·1 answer
  • How do electromagnetic waves transfer energy?
    7·1 answer
  • Which statements best describes why science changes?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!