Mass is not conserved in chemical reactions. Mass is therefore never conserved because a little of it turns into energy in every reaction
Answer:
Mass = 42.8g
Explanation:
4 NH 3 ( g ) + 5 O 2 ( g ) ⟶ 4 NO ( g ) + 6 H 2 O ( g )
Observe that every 4 mole of ammonia requires 5 moles of oxygen to obtain 4 moles of Nitrogen oxide and 6 moles of water.
Step 1: Determine the balanced chemical equation for the chemical reaction.
The balanced chemical equation is already given.
Step 2: Convert all given information into moles (through the use of molar mass as a conversion factor).
Ammonia = 63.4g × 1mol / 17.031 g = 3.7226mol
Oxygen = 63.4g × 1mol / 32g = 1.9813mol
Step 3: Calculate the mole ratio from the given information. Compare the calculated ratio to the actual ratio.
If all of the 1.9831 moles of oxygen were to be used up, there would need to be 1.9831 × 4 / 5 or 1.5865 moles of Ammonia. We have 3.72226 moles of ammonia - Far excess. Because there is an excess of Ammonia, the Oxygen amount is used to calculate the amount of the products in the reaction.
Step 4: Use the amount of limiting reactant to calculate the amount of H2O produced.
5 moles of O2 = 6 moles of H2O
1.9831 moles = x
x = (1.9831 * 6 ) / 5
x = 2.37972 moles
Mass of H2O = Molar mass * Molar mass
Mass = 2.7972 * 18
Mass = 42.8g
Answer:
Thats all i can think of Hope this helped
Explanation:
Brown eyes
first born is a boy
pale skin
Answer: Sustainable living
Explanation: It is a lifestyle by which an individual uses natural resources only as much as is necessary, which means in limited quantities, and thus reduces the general enormous exploitation of these resources. In this way, the needs of the individual are met and resources are put to use for generations to come. It also refers to personal resources as well as Earth resources in general.
It is obvious from today's point of view that if food was produced only as much as needed, it would mean not throwing away food, everyone, both those who could otherwise afford food and those who are now starving, would be fed up.
With the reduction of production not only of food but also of other necessities, that is, with production to meet the needs and not beyond, there would be less pollution and less emission of harmful hags and greenhouse effect.