I think it’s false. The second law states that the acceleration of an object is dependent upon two variables - the net force acting upon the object and then mass of the object.
Answer:
x=22.57 m
Explanation:
Given that
35 m in W of S
angle = 40 degrees
25 m in east
From the diagram
The angle
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/992c5/992c59a52e93f71092b9c38edb7b8c88003e8552" alt="\theta=90-40=50^o"
From the triangle OAB
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67c53/67c5328d453f1a255b9089cf0a0d3ce57aa6f5a2" alt="cos40^o=\frac{35^2+25^2-x^2}{2\times 35\times 25}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35ebb/35ebb3644898cbae455b27123f2dff9bcabbfa22" alt="1340.57=35^2+25^2-x^2"
x=22.57 m
Therefore the answer of the above problem will be 22.57 m
<span>Diamond slowdown light more than Quartz , because diamonds have a greater index of refraction. Light will bend when its move from one medium to another. The Index of Refraction of Material is found by comparing the speed of light in their respective mediums.</span>
At the same time, however, you get less detail or less precision in a chart or graph than you do in the table. Imagine the difference between a table of sales figures for a ten-year period and a line graph for that same data. You get a better sense of the overall trend in the graph but not the precise dollar amount.