Answer:
Explanation:
a )
from lens makers formula
f is focal length , r₁ is radius of curvature of one face and r₂ is radius of curvature of second face
putting the values
1.462 = 2 - 1 / r₂
1 / r₂ = .538
r₂ = 1.86 cm .
= 18.6 mm .
b )
object distance u = 25 cm
focal length of convex lens f = 1.8 cm
image distance v = ?
lens formula
.5555 - .04
= .515
v = 1.94 cm
c )
magnification = v / u
= 1.94 / 25
= .0776
size of image = .0776 x size of object
= .0776 x 10 mm
= .776 mm
It will be a real image and it will be inverted.
Answer:
The time elapsed at the spacecraft’s frame is less that the time elapsed at earth's frame
Explanation:
From the question we are told that
The distance between earth and Retah is 
Here c is the peed of light with value 
The time taken to reach Retah from earth is 
The velocity of the spacecraft is mathematically evaluated as
substituting values
The time elapsed in the spacecraft’s frame is mathematically evaluated as
substituting value
![T = 90000 * \sqrt{ 1 - \frac{[2.4*10^{8}]^2}{[3.0*10^{8}]^2} }](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=T%20%20%3D%20%2090000%20%2A%20%20%5Csqrt%7B%201%20-%20%20%5Cfrac%7B%5B2.4%2A10%5E%7B8%7D%5D%5E2%7D%7B%5B3.0%2A10%5E%7B8%7D%5D%5E2%7D%20%7D)
=> 
So The time elapsed at the spacecraft’s frame is less that the time elapsed at earth's frame
Answer:
3.6 KJ
Explanation: Given that a 70-kg boy is surfing and catches a wave which gives him an initial speed of 1.6 m/s. He then drops through a height of 1.60 m, and ends with a speed of 8.5 m/s. How much nonconservative work (in kJ) was done on the boy
The workdone = the energy.
There are two different energies in the scenario - the potential energy (P.E ) and the kinetic energy ( K.E )
P.E = mgh
P.E = 70 × 9.8 × 1.6
P.E = 1097.6 J
P.E = 1.098 KJ
K.E = 1/2mv^2
K.E = 1/2 × 70 × 8.5^2
K.E = 2528.75 J
K.E = 2.529 KJ
The non conservative workdone = K.E + P.E
Work done = 1.098 + 2.529
Work done = 3.63 KJ
Therefore, the non conservative workdone is 3.6 KJ approximately
