Answer:
.
Explanation:
The frequency 
of a wave is equal to the number of wave cycles that go through a point on its path in unit time (where "unit time" is typically equal to one second.)
The wave in this question travels at a speed of 
. In other words, the wave would have traveled 
in each second. Consider a point on the path of this wave. If a peak was initially at that point, in one second that peak would be
How many wave cycles can fit into that ? The wavelength of this wave
gives the length of one wave cycle. Therefore:
.
That is: there are 
wave cycles in of this wave.
On the other hand, Because that of this wave goes through that point in each second, that wave cycles will go through that point in the same amount of time. Hence, the frequency of this wave would be
Because one wave cycle per second is equivalent to one Hertz, the frequency of this wave can be written as:
.
The calculations above can be expressed with the formula:
,
where
represents the speed of this wave, and 
represents the wavelength of this wave.
Hey there,
<span>It means- the amount of energy required to raise the temperature of a liter of water one degree centigrade at sea level
</span>
Hope this helps :))
~Top
the answer is b. it's commercially reprocessed
Answer:
Yes convection will always work faster and more efficiently.
Explanation:
When a gas or a liquid is heated, hot areas of the material flow and mix with the cool areas. ... Convection transfers heat over a distance faster than conduction. But ultimately conduction must transfer the heat from the gas to the other object, though molecular contact.
