a. The risk of injury must be predictable.
b. A "breach of duty" is when a professional fails to uphold a level of care.
c. There must be a standard of care in place, and the practitioner must assume responsibility for the patient.
d. There must be a clear link between the treatment received and the harm.
<h3>What is malpractice?</h3>
Malpractice, commonly referred to as professional negligence, is defined as "an incident of carelessness or incompetence on the part of a professional" under tort law.
The following professionals might be the target of malpractice claims:
Medical professionals: If a doctor or other healthcare practitioner does not exercise the level of care and competence that a similarly situated professional in the same medical field would deliver under the circumstances, a medical malpractice claim may be made against them.
Lawyers: Failure to provide services with the amount of competence, care, and diligence that a reasonable lawyer would use in the same situation may be grounds for a legal malpractice claim.
To know more about malpractice, visit;
brainly.com/question/25441985
#SPJ4
<h2>
Answer:</h2>
It's easy to fall into the temptation to say that when the velocity is zero, then the acceleration is also zero. But wait! To answer this question we need to bring out the concept of instantaneous velocity. This type of velocity stands for a specific moment, a specific instant of time, that is, 
. If so, then acceleration may not be zero when velocity is zero. For example, suppose you throw an object upward, when it is at the top of the travel the instantaneous velocity is zero because it changes from positive to negative value and there is a moment when it must be zero, but yet there is a constant acceleration by the Earth's gravity at that moment. Even though the velocity at that stationary moment is zero, it doesn't imply the acceleration must be zero, so it has a value and in this case is 
