Answer:
diversity
Explanation:
Diversity is defined as a specific range of people that possesses the different socioeconomic, ethnic, cultural, and racial background and different interests, lifestyles, and experiences.
"Diversity in the workplace" refers to a process that states a specific company's employees encompasses different people having distinct age, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender, religion, religion languages, race, abilities, cultural background, education, etc.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the "diversity".
Answer:
True
Explanation:
This is true because most dominant parties always win the elections, yes third party candidates always try to prove to the public what they can do, but dominant party always find there way around wining the election due to there dominant force in politics.
Some voters also believe they most dominant party will rig the election and third parties dont have a chance that is why they wont bother voting for the third party because they wont win, actually the third party candidates always made good point in election campaign but the chances for them to win are always slim that is why they are inclined to vote for a dominant party candidates.
<span>c. articles.
Specifically Article One
</span>
The belief and values that you were raised with are not exactly yours, they influenced you and they shaped who you are but you don't have to share them.
This means, they're not part of your abilities, hobbies or interests, but instead they are part of your background - the correct answer is b)
Some patient safety leaders believe the definition of harm should be broader than the definition in the ihi global trigger tool because health care systems should work to prevent more types of harm than the current definition includes.
The IHI Global Trigger Tool for Measuring Adverse Events provides an easy-to-use method for accurately identifying adverse events (harm) and measuring the rate of adverse events over time. Tracking adverse events over time is a useful way to tell if changes being made are improving the safety of the care processes. The Trigger Tool methodology is a retrospective review of a random sample of inpatient hospital records using “triggers” (or clues) to identify possible adverse events. Many hospitals have used this tool to identify adverse events, to assess the level of harm from each adverse event, and to determine whether adverse events are reduced over time as a result of improvement efforts. It is important to note, however, that the IHI Global Trigger Tool is not meant to identify every single adverse event in an inpatient record. The methodology, recommended time limit for review, and random selection of records are designed to produce a sampling approach that is sufficient to determine harm rates and observe improvement over time.
The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) formed the Idealized Design of the Medication System (IDMS) Group in May 2000. This group of 30 physicians, pharmacists, nurses, statisticians, and other professionals established an aim to design a medication system that is safer by a factor of 10 and more cost effective than systems currently in use. The Trigger Tool for Measuring Adverse Drug Events was initially developed by this group to assess progress on this safety goal and provided the basis for development of subsequent Trigger Tools.
This white paper is designed to provide comprehensive information on the development and methodology of the IHI Global Trigger Tool, with step-by-step instructions for using the tool to measure adverse events in a hospital.
Learn more about IHI Global Trigger Tool here
brainly.com/question/13216038
#SPJ4
