Ask question

Ask question

All categories

Juliette [100K]

3 years ago

10

If the intensity of light that is incident on a piece of metal is increased, what else will be increased? Choose all that apply.

number of electrons ejected stopping voltage cutoff frequency frequency KEmax work function wavelength

1 answer:

natka813 [3]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

explained

Explanation:

When the intensity of light is increased on a piece of metal only the number of electron ejected will increase because all other things independent of intensity of light.

Light below certain frequency will not cause any electron emission no matter how intense.

The intensity produces more electron but does not change the maximum kinetic energy of electrons.

Work function is independent of the intensity of light, because it is an intrinsic property of a material.

You might be interested in

According to a certain estimate, the depth N(t), in centimeters, of the water in a certain tank at t hours past 2:00 in the morn

never [62]

Answer:

b) 7.00

Explanation:

N( t ) = -20( t - 5 )²

dN/ dt = -20 x 2 ( t - 5 )

For maximum N ( depth )

dN/dt = 0

- 40 ( t - 5 ) = 0

t = 5

So at 2 + 5 = 7 .00 am depth of water reaches its maximum.

6 0

3 years ago

When beavers inhabit an area, they cut down trees and construct beaver dams, which slow the flow of rivers or streams. Which of

Airida [17]

Answer: H

Explanation:

When beavers dam a stream they slow the movement of water. Behind the beaver dam, a pond of still water is formed. This pond is then colonized by animals and plants that typically live in lakes rather than streams.

6 0

2 years ago

It is 5.00 km from your home to the physics lab. As part of your physical fitness program, you could run that distance at 10.0 k

8_murik_8 [283]

Answer:

a. Walking burns up more energy.

b. 1740 kJ

c. This is because more intense exercise releases a lot of energy in a short period of time, whereas, less intense energy releases it energy gradually over a long period of time.

Explanation:

a. We know energy W = Pt where P = power and t = time.

Now for walking, t = d/v where d = distance = 5.00 km and v = speed = 3.00 km/hr and P = 290 W

So, t = d/v = 5.00 km/3.00 km/hr = 5/3 hr = 5/3 × 3600 s = 6000 s

W = Pt = 290 W × 6000 s = 1740000 = 1740 kJ

Now for running, t = d/v where d = distance = 5.00 km and v = speed = 10.00 km/hr

So, t = d/v = 5.00 km/10.00 km/hr = 0.5 hr = 0.5 × 3600 s = 1800 s and P = 700 W

W = Pt = 700 W × 1800 s = 1260000 = 1260 kJ

Since walking burns up 1740 kJ and running burns up 1260 kJ, walking burns up more energy.

b. It burns up 1740 kJ

c. This is because more intense exercise releases a lot of energy in a short period of time, whereas, less intense energy releases it energy gradually over a long period of time.

4 0

3 years ago

How would you respond to a person who argued that the Big Bang theory is incorrect because it is only a theory and theories have

Umnica [9.8K]

Well, you would reply that that's not what theories are. Theories explain the how and the why, laws explain the what. So, the Big Bang theory isn't "just a theory". It's a theory, it explains the how. (Also, if someone tells you it's anti-God or whatever, tell them the thoery was created by a Catholic scientist. True fact.) I hoped this helped!!! (You don't have the include who created the theory if this is for homework.)

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Compare the circular velocity of a particle orbiting in the Encke Division, whose distance from Saturn 133,370 km, to a particle

Ket [755]

Answer:

The particle in the D ring is 1399 times faster than the particle in the Encke Division.

Explanation:

The circular velocity is define as:

$v = \frac{2 \pi r}{T}$

Where r is the radius of the trajectory and T is the orbital period

To determine the circular velocity of both particles it is necessary to know the orbital period of each one. That can be done by means of the Kepler’s third law:

$T^{2} = r^{3}$

Where T is orbital period and r is the radius of the trajectory.

Case for the particle in the Encke Division:

$T^{2} = r^{3}$

$T = \sqrt{(133370 Km)^{3}}$

$T = \sqrt{(2.372x10^{15} Km)}$

$T = 4.870x10^{7} Km$

It is necessary to pass from kilometers to astronomical unit (AU), where 1 AU is equivalent to 150.000.000 Km ( $1.50x10^{8} Km$ )

1 AU is defined as the distance between the earth and the sun.

$\frac{4.870x10^{7} Km}{1.50x10^{8}Km} . 1AU$

$T = 0.324 AU$

But 1 year is equivalent to 1 AU according with Kepler’s third law, since 1 year is the orbital period of the earth.

$T = \frac{0.324 AU}{1 AU} . 1 year$

$T = 0.324 year$

That can be expressed in units of days

$T = \frac{0.324 year}{1 year} . 365.25 days$

$T = 118.60 days$

<em>Circular velocity for the particle in the </em><em>Encke Division</em><em>:</em>

$v = \frac{2 \pi r}{T}$

$v = \frac{2 \pi (133370 Km)}{(118.60 days)}$

For a better representation of the velocity, kilometers and days are changed to meters and seconds respectively.

$118.60 days .\frac{86400 s}{1 day}$ ⇒ 10247040 s

$133370 Km .\frac{1000 m}{1 Km}$ ⇒ 133370000 m

$v = \frac{2 \pi (133370000 m)}{(10247040 s)}$

$v = 81.778 m/s$

Case for the particle in the D Ring:

For the case of the particle in the D Ring, the same approach used above can be followed

$T^{2} = r^{3}$

$T = \sqrt{(69000 Km)^{3}}$

$T = \sqrt{(3.285x10^{14} Km)}$

$T = 1.812x10^{7} Km$

$\frac{1.812x10^{7} Km}{1.50x10^{8}Km} . 1 AU$

$T = 0.120 AU$

$T = \frac{0.120 AU}{1 AU} . 1 year$

$T = 0.120 year$

$T = \frac{0.120 year}{1 year} . 365.25 days$

$T = 43.83 days$

<em>Circular velocity for the particle in </em><em>D Ring</em><em>:</em>

$v = \frac{2 \pi r}{T}$

$v = \frac{2 \pi (69000 Km)}{(43.83 days)}$

For a better representation of the velocity, kilometers and days are changed to meters and seconds respectively.

$43.83 days . \frac{86400 s}{1 day}$ ⇒ 3786912 s

$69000 Km . \frac{1000 m}{ 1 Km}$ ⇒ 69000000 m

$v = \frac{2 \pi (69000000 m)}{(3786912 s)}$

$v = 114.483 m/s$

$\frac{114.483 m/s}{81.778 m/s} = 1.399$

The particle in the D ring is 1399 times faster than the particle in the Encke Division.

7 0

3 years ago