1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
earnstyle [38]
3 years ago
5

Why are chemical changes considered “unseen”?

Chemistry
2 answers:
atroni [7]3 years ago
6 0
<span>The correct answer here is that the reason chemical changes can be considered unseen, is because the alterations made within an element when it undergoes a chemical change occurs within the very atoms of the cell itself. In contrast with this, a physical change (such as a solid changing to a liquid through melting) does not change the element itself, but just it's physical form, so this can be seen easily to the human eye.</span>
enot [183]3 years ago
5 0

Answer is: chemical changes are considered "unseen", because they occur at the atomic level.

There are two types of substance changes: chemical and physical.

In chemical change (chemical reaction) new substances are formed, the atoms are rearranged (atoms are invisible to human eyes).

Physical property can be observed and measured without any changes in molecular composition. The same substance is present before and after the psysical change, just with different form or state of matter, this changes are seen by human eyes because of change of color or state of matter.

You might be interested in
In water, what happens to a base?
BartSMP [9]
A base in water will form hydroxide ions. This is because bases are AOH while acids are AH+. I hope this helps!
5 0
4 years ago
Please help me thank you!!
mestny [16]

Answer:

I kinda forgot but let me think

4 0
3 years ago
Which statement is true for a heating curve?
lions [1.4K]
I think it shows how the temperature of a substance changes when heated
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following experimental observations proved that the plum pudding model was flawed? (1 point)
VladimirAG [237]

Emest Rutherford proved that the plum pudding model was incorrect then he experimented by firing cathode rays at gold foil.

4 0
3 years ago
1. If a solution of sodium chloride has 22.3 g of
lina2011 [118]

<u>We are given:</u>

Mass of NaCl in the given solution = 22.3 grams

Volume of the given solution = 2 L

<u></u>

<u>Number of Moles of NaCl:</u>

We know that the number of moles = Given mass / Molar mass

Number of moles = 22.3 / 58.44 = 0.382 moles

<u></u>

<u>Molarity of NaCl in the Given solution:</u>

We know that Molarity of a solution = Moles of Solute / Volume of Solution(in L)

Molarity = 0.382 / 2

Molarity = 0.191 M

<em />

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • This map shows the ages of the Atlantic oceanic crust
    6·1 answer
  • Please help me out with 2-5. It would really help
    14·1 answer
  • Remember that it takes 2 electrons to form a bond how many bonds does CIO 3 - have, the chlorate ion
    6·2 answers
  • 28.6 g + 327.33 g + 5891.212 g=
    8·1 answer
  • According to the bohr model, how do electrons move in atoms?
    12·1 answer
  • An aqueous KNO3 solution is made using 75.1 g of KNO3 diluted to a total solution volume of 1.95 L .Calculate the molarity of th
    9·1 answer
  • A detailed description please...
    13·1 answer
  • Select 2-possible ointment bases. Select one or more:
    12·1 answer
  • (1) How will you determine which dyes are present in the beverage that you have chosen to analyze?
    10·1 answer
  • I need help with my science project someone help me answer it!
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!