The fundamental closeness is they have a similar like charges repulse each other, distinctive charges pull in each other. While their distinction is that attractive "charges" can't be isolated. At any rate, so far it has not been accomplished. I trust this makes a difference.
The point where m3 experiences a zero net gravitational force due to M1 and m2 is 57.42 m.
<h3>
Position of the third mass</h3>
m1<------(x)------> m3 <-----------(94.8 m - x)-------->m2
a point, x, where m3 experiences a zero net gravitational force due to M1 and m2;
Force on m3 due to m1 = Force on m3 due to m2
Gm1m3/d² = Gm2m3/r²
m1/d² = m2/r²
where;
- d is the distance between m1 and m3 = x
- r is the distance between m3 and m2 = 94.8 - x
m1/(x²) = m2/(94.8 - x)²
m1(94.8 - x)² = m2x²
(94.8 - x)² = (m2/m1)x²
(94.8 - x)² = (10.6/25)x²
(94.8 - x)² = 0.424x²
(94.8 - x)² = (0.651)²x²
94.8 - x = 0.651x
94.8 = 1.651x
x = 94.8/1.651
x = 57.42 m
Thus, the point where m3 experiences a zero net gravitational force due to M1 and m2 is 57.42 m.
Learn more about gravitational force here: brainly.com/question/72250
#SPJ1
C. The heating element on a stove turning from black to orange
Hope this helps =]
Answer:
The period would decrease by `sqrt(2)`.
Explanation:
The angular frequency omega of an oscillating mass m due to a spring with a constant k is given by

(this is obtained by solving the differential equation
)
If k doubles, i.e., k'=2k, then

Since the angular frequency is
, we can say that

and so it becomes clear that the period T will decrease by sqrt(2) as stated in choice (D).