A theorem can be proven (from axioms or prior theorems), using logic.
A hypothesis can be supported by evidence. The more evidence in support of the hypothesis, the more likely the hypothesis is to be correct. However, you’re always at the mercy of contrary evidence appearing in the future, to reduce the likelihood or even invalidate a hypothesis.
A (mathematical) proof suffers no such vulnerability to future evidence, as long as you hold the axioms of the theory to be true, and as long as there was no flaw in the construction of the proof.
Answer: 110000
Explanation:
26/9=30.5555555556
30.5555555556 x 60=1833.33333333
110000 x 60=110000
<em>Anything</em> that's dropped through air is somewhat affected by air resistance. But, out of that list, the leaf and the balloon are the items that will be affected by air resistance enough so that you can plainly see it.
If you spend some time thinking about it, you can kind of understand why airplane wings and boat propellers are shaped more like leafs and balloons than like bricks and rocks.
Answer:
t = 0.029s
Explanation:
In order to calculate the interaction time at the moment of catching the ball, you take into account that the force exerted on an object is also given by the change, on time, of its linear momentum:
(1)
m: mass of the water balloon = 1.20kg
Δv: change in the speed of the balloon = v2 - v1
v2: final speed = 0m/s (the balloon stops in my hands)
v1: initial speed = 13.0m/s
Δt: interaction time = ?
The water balloon brakes if the force is more than 530N. You solve the equation (1) for Δt and replace the values of the other parameters:
The interaction time to avoid that the water balloon breaks is 0.029s
D, 0.140 liters! Hang on a sec and I'll show you a trick I use.
