According to the article "Nuclear shapes" by Renee Lucas the nucleus's shape is mainly modified by vibrational and rotational features happening within the cell. According to the article if i read correctly "near closed shells spherical shapes prevail, while between closed shells the large number of valence nucleons in orbit with large particle angular momentum leads to nuclei with large deformations leading them to not only maintain its shape but also alloying it to work.
Answer:
No, not necessarily
Explanation:
If an object is moving with an acceleration that causes its speed to be reduced, there will be a moment in which it reaches v = 0, but this doesn't necessarily mean that the acceleration isn't acting anymore. If the object continues its movement with the same acceleration, it's velocity will become negative.
An example of an object that has zero velocity but non-zero acceleration:
If you throw an object in the air with a certain velocity, it will move vertically, reducing its velocity in a 9,8 
rate (which is the acceleration caused by gravity). At a certain point, the object will reach its maximum height, and will start to fall. In the exact moment that it reaches the maximum height, before it starts falling, its velocity is zero, but gravity is still acting on the object (this is the reason why it starts falling instead of just being stopped at that point). Therefore, at that point, the object has zero velocity but an acceleration of 9,8 .
In a way it’s true because you can get a ticket for getting caught littering
Explanation:
Fgravity = G*(mass1*mass2)/D²
G is the gravitational constant throughout the universe.
D is the distance between both objects.
D is now reduced by a factor of 5, meaning Dnew = D/5 we get
Fgravitynew = G*(mass1*mass2)/(D/5)² =
= G*(mass1*mass2)/(D²/25) =
= 25* G*(mass1*mass2)/D² = 25* Fgravity
the new force of gravity/attraction is 25×16 = 400 units.
If the Earth didn't tilt then we wouldn't have seasons.
