That statement is false
Outside of contrary belief, there are a lot of good medical institutions that exist outside united states.
For example, medical tourism in south East asia is currenly booming because of the quality of care that could be provided by hospitals in Kuala lumpur and Singapore.
Answer:
imprinting
Explanation:
Konrad Lorenz is referred to as the father of ethology (the study of animal behavior), and has established the concept of imprinting.
Imprinting is described as a critical period in an animal's life when they form attachment and develop their identity. Through imprinting, a bond is developed between the caregiver and the newly born animal. Mammals and birds tend to imprint naturally by birth to their mother or caregiver. Animals gain a sense of species identification through imprinting.
In the past, learners were required to achieve at least 50% in four specific designated subjects that were the same nationwide. However, this was recently changed - the new requirements include attaining the same percentage in any four subjects that have 20 credits from a list of subjects.
This change has certain advantages and disadvantages. The advantage is that there will be more students with better percentages applying for various high education institutions as it should now be easier for them to pick subjects they are most confident in and that will be relevant for their further education. Their focus will also be on those most important subjects for them and their studies instead of on something they might not even need in their future career.
However, a disadvantage is that students might pick subjects they find easiest just to secure their place in a university. Those subjects ultimately might not provide them with needed strategies for thinking and learning that otherwise designated subjects might have. Furthermore, some higher education institutions might have their own lists of designated subjects and minimum entry requirements that might not be the same as the student's choices
A survey would be reliable if it had the same results, because then it would have been proven time and time again that it is credible. It is valid when it measures to what it intends to measure, because if it didn't, how would it be valid? In order for it to be valid, it has to make sense and measure what it intends to measure. The answer is D: reliable; valid.
This argument is based on <span>The linguistic relativity hypothesis
According to </span><span>The linguistic relativity hypothesis, the language that people use in our day to day life will heavily influence the view/cognition of the speaker.
For example, if a person tend to use high-energy language, that person will be more likely to feel optimistic in facing the problem in front of him/her</span>
