All categories

3 years ago

Which of the following will not reduce water pollution?

Physics

2 answers:

Rina8888 [55]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

A. Using artificial fertilizers instead of composting

Explanation:

Composting is actually more better than fertilizers usually, as it takes natural waste and with help of nature, returning the nutrients into soil once again. However, Artificial fertilizers usually uses chemicals to ensure that weed does not grow, and may contain other "unnatural" ingredients to ensure that only the crop grows on the field. Because of the usage of non-natural ingredients, any run-off can prove to be detrimental to any animals that eat any of the run-off infected material, or drink the polluted water.

Scrat [10]3 years ago

7 0

Explanation: Using artificial fertilizers instead of composting is one of the main causes of water pollution. When it rains the artificial fertiliser will run into lakes, ponds, or any other body of water. The water will then be polluted with chemicals. Composting will not do this. There are no chemicals in compost.

You might be interested in

Charcoal appears black in color because it

steposvetlana [31]

C. This is the idea of "black body radiation". Charcoal/carbon is a "perfect black body". Absorbs all radiation. There's a whole host of stuff about this in physics, including, I think, Planck's (Nobel Prize winner) black body radiation theory.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why are average temperatures higher at the equator than near the poles?

elena55 [62]

Bc the equator is constantly facing the sun while the earth rotates

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

If a football player does 39000 J of work, how much power does the football player exert in 5 minutes

Drupady [299]

Answer:

Power = 130 watt

Explanation:

Power is described as the ability to do work, it is also defined as the amount of work in Joules done in a given time in seconds. Mathematically, it is represented as:

$power = \frac{work (J)}{Time (s)}$

In this example, power is calculated as follows:

Work = 39000 J

Time = 5 minutes

converting the time from minutes to seconds:

1 minute = 60 seconds

∴ 5 minutes = 60 × 5 = 300 seconds

$\therefore power = \frac{39000}{300} \\power = 130 watt$

N:B the unit for power can also be represented as Joules/seconds or J/s or JS⁻¹

6 0

2 years ago

Two circular coils are concentric and lie in the same plane. The inner coil contains 170 turns of wire, has a radius of 0.012 m,

GREYUIT [131]

Answer:

The current of the outer coil is $I_o = 3.99 \ A$

Explanation:

From the question we are told that

The number of turns of the inner coil is $N_i = 170 \ turn$

The radius of the inner coil is $R_i = 0.012 \ m$

The current of the inner coil is $I_i = 6.2 \ A$

The number of turns of the outer coil is $N_o = 220 \ turns$

The radius of the outer coil is $R_o = 0.02 0 \ m$

Generally the net magnetic field is mathematically represented as

$B = \frac{N \ mu I }{ 2 * R }$

Now from told that the net magnetic field is common

$\frac{N_i \mu I_i} {2 * R _i} = \frac{N_o \mu I_o} {2 * R _o}$

Here $\mu$ is the permeability of free space

making $I_o$ the subject

$I_o = \frac{ N_i I_i *2 * R _o}{N_o *2 * R _i}$

substituting values

$I_o = \frac{ 170 *6.2 *2 * 0.020}{220 *2 * 0.012}$

$I_o = 3.99 \ A$

5 0

3 years ago

If a 1.0-kg-mass block is on the left cap, how much total mass must be placed on the right cap so that the caps equilibrate at e

Dennis_Churaev [7]

<span>The total mass that should be placed in the right cap so that the caps equilibrate at equal height is also 1 kg. if equilibrium should be maintained the force in each side should cancel out, so to balance a 1kg mass, a 1 kg mass should also be place on the opposite direction</span>

3 0

2 years ago