Answer:
The benefits of a High Speed Rail in California:
- It becomes a feasible alternative to air travel, because it can be either cheaper, or even faster, since passengers do not have to spend as much time on a train station as they do on an airport.
- If demand is high enough, state highways can become less congested, because many people who would otherwise travel by car, would take a high speed train instead.
- Because the trains are electric, they are likely to help reduce pollution.
The cons would be:
- We cannot know for sure how many people would take the high speed trains. Demand could not be high enough to justify the cost.
- The line would be very costly.
- It could end up benefit only a small section of the population who would take the trains, or who travel often.
I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, as can be seen in most countries where high speed lines have been made between large cities. For example, in Spain, the line between Madrid and Barcelona is profitable. The same would likely happen for a line between Los Angeles and San Francisco.
What are the implications of starting a project based on tenuous projections that may or may not come true 10 years from now?
If demand projections are tenous, there is always the possiblity that the high speed line could not be profitable. However, this risk can be lowered if the line is made between highly populated cities.
Could you justify the California high-speed rail project from the perspective of a massive public works initiative?
Yes, a high speed rail would be a project that could massively impact California. The benefits of its operation could outweight the cost.
In other words, what other factors enter into the decision of whether to pursue a high-speed rail project?
As I said before, the most important factor is to construct line between highly populated cities in order to reduce the risk of not having enough demand. It has been demonstrated around the world, in Spain, in Italy, in Japan, in China, that high speed lines that connect very populated regions, can be profitable.
Answer:
The equilibrium quantity falls and the effect on the equilibrium wage of radiologists is indeterminate.
Explanation:
Here are the options to this question :
What is likely to happen to the equilibrium wage and quantity of radiologists following these twoevents?
A) The equilibrium wage and the equilibrium quantity of radiologists fall.
B) The equilibrium quantity falls and the effect on the equilibrium wage of radiologists is indeterminate.
C) The equilibrium wage falls and the effect on equilibrium quantity of radiologists isindeterminate.D
) The equilibrium wage and the equilibrium quantity of radiologists rise
As a result of event A, there would be a decrease in the demand for radiologists. As a result, there would be a leftward shift of the demand curve for radiologist. This would lead to a reduction in equilibrium price and quantity
As a result of event B, there would be a decrease in the supply radiologists. As a result, there would be a leftward shift of the supply curve of radiologist. This would lead to a reduction in equilibrium quantity and a rise in equilibrium price.
Taking these two effects together, the equilibrium quantity falls and the effect on the equilibrium wage of radiologists is indeterminate.
Teresa's decisions to stay with the business and work from home exemplify <u>"long-term strategic plans".</u>
A strategic plan with key long-term objectives fills in as a structure for settling on choices and gives a premise to arranging. Assembling a key arrangement can give the knowledge expected to stay with an on track by defining objectives and estimating achievements. By breaking down the data in the long term plan, administrators can roll out important improvements and set the phase for additionally arranging.
Two main characteristics of Public goods are that they are non-excludability and non-competitiveness. These characteristics make it difficult for market producers to sell their goods to the individual consumers. The Non-excludable means that it is expensive or impossible for users to exclude other users from using the product.
The US Border Patrol is a Public Good US Border Patrol is a public good because it is the non-competitive and non-exclusive. The Satellite TV is personal property. Equilibrium output is greater than efficient output when negative externalities exist in the market. Use the regulations that require firms to internalize external costs.
To learn more bout Public goods, click here.
brainly.com/question/14975509
#SPJ4
Answer:
b. 8.225%
Explanation:
The rate formula will be used to solve this question.
Please note that the NPER represents the time value.
Where;
Present value is $754.08
Let's assume that the face value is $1,000
PMT= 1,000 x 7.25% ÷2
=$36.25
NPER= 9 years x 2
= 18 years
The formulae is therefore
Rate(NPER,PMT,-,PV,FV)
The value of the present value is negative.
a. The pretax would therefore be 11.75%
b. After tax cost of debt would be ;
Pretax cost of debt x (1 - tax rate)
11.75% x (1 - 30%)
11.75% x (1 - 0.03)
=8.225%.
