448 K is the final temperature of the water.
<h3>What is specific heat capacity?</h3>
The specific heat capacity is defined as the quantity of heat (J) absorbed per unit mass (kg) of the material when its temperature increases by 1 K (or 1 °C), and its units are J/(kg K) or J/(kg °C).
Given,
the mass of Na is 23 g
The volume of water = 293 cm3
Mass of water = 293 g
Total solution mass = 23 g + 293 g = 316 g
Specific heat capacity of water = 4.18 J/Kg
The equation relating mass, heat, specific heat capacity and temperature change is:
q = mcΔT
197 kJ = 316 g x 4.18 J/Kg x (
)
197 kJ = 316 g x 4.18 J/Kg x ( 
-298 K)
0.1491429956 x 1000 = -298 K
149.1429956 + 298 =
447.1429956 =
448 K =
Hence, 448 K is the final temperature of the water.
<h3>What does a high specific heat capacity mean?</h3>
A high specific heat capacity means that it can store a large amount of thermal energy for a small change in mass or temperature.
Learn more about specific heat capacity here:
brainly.com/question/2530523
#SPJ4
Ammonia is formed by a reaction between hydrogen and nitrogen as shown by the equation below.
N2(g) + 3H2(g) = 2NH3(g)
1 mole of ammonia contains 17 g
Therefore 10.78 g of ammonia are equivalent to 10.78/17 = 0.6341 moles
The mole ratio of hydrogen to ammonia is 3 : 2
Therefore, moles of hydrogen used will be 0.6341 × 3/2 = 0.9512 moles
1 mole of hydrogen is equivalent to 2 g
Thus, the mas of hydrogen will be 0.9512 moles × 2 = 1.9023 g
1. The reactivity among the alkali metals increases as you go down the group due to the decrease in the effective nuclear charge from the increased shielding by the greater number of electrons. The greater the atomic number, the weaker the hold on the valence electron the nucleus has, and the more easily the element can lose the electron. Conversely, the lower the atomic number, the greater pull the nucleus has on the valence electron, and the less readily would the element be able to lose the electron (relatively speaking). Thus, in the first set comprising group I elements, sodium (Na) would be the least likely to lose its valence electron (and, for that matter, its core electrons).
2. The elements in this set are the group II alkaline earth metals, and they follow the same trend as the alkali metals. Of the elements here, beryllium (Be) would have the highest effective nuclear charge, and so it would be the least likely to lose its valence electrons. In fact, beryllium has a tendency not to lose (or gain) electrons, i.e., ionize, at all; it is unique among its congeners in that it tends to form covalent bonds.
3. While the alkali and alkaline earth metals would lose electrons to attain a noble gas configuration, the group VIIA halogens, as we have here, would need to gain a valence electron for an full octet. The trends in the group I and II elements are turned on their head for the halogens: The smaller the atomic number, the less shielding, and so the greater the pull by the nucleus to gain a valence electron. And as the atomic number increases (such as when you go down the group), the more shielding there is, the weaker the effective nuclear charge, and the lesser the tendency to gain a valence electron. Bromine (Br) has the largest atomic number among the halogens in this set, so an electron would feel the smallest pull from a bromine atom; bromine would thus be the least likely here to gain a valence electron.
4. The pattern for the elements in this set (the group VI chalcogens) generally follows that of the halogens. The greater the atomic number, the weaker the pull of the nucleus, and so the lesser the tendency to gain electrons. Tellurium (Te) has the highest atomic number among the elements in the set, and so it would be the least likely to gain electrons.
