I think this is true because..
technology negatively affects the environment by compromising human health and safety... endangering natural ecosystem and biodiversity... having a cumulative impact on global systems... and depleting natural resources. Technology positively affects the environment through the application of environmental science to solve problems caused by human environmental impact.
Risks to humans from environmental damage through technology include inhalation of dangerous chemicals in air pollution, contamination of water and food sources, and risk of infections and diseases through exposure to toxic wastes. Flora and fauna risk habitat loss or disruption and extinction of species through exposure to dangerous byproducts of technology. Greenhouse gases affect atmosphere and weather systems, causing global warming and chlorofluorocarbons that deplete the Earth's ozone layer. Technology consumes resources which are not necessarily renewable, including living resources, such as forests and populations of fish, and inanimate resources, such as natural chemicals and minerals.
Although technology damages the environment in many ways..it can also have the capability to limit or prevent damage using such environmental technologies such as recycling...the exploitation of renewable energy sources such as solar power and wind power... the purification of polluted air and water,and the treatment of sewage and factory wastes.. and the development and production of devices that promote energy conservation.....so this is why i think this is the answer! ☺
Hopefully this helped you!☺
<span>Petroleum and biomass are burned in combustion reactions, which liberate energy stored in chemical bonds. This is chemical energy. In contrast, nuclear energy comes from the conversion of mass into energy when an nuclear reaction occurs. Geothermal energy comes directly from heat sources underground, with no chemical or nuclear reactions.</span>
Answer:
1. They debated about many things.
2. Greek philosophers debated about things. They did not have a scientific/experiment based approach to studying nature. They did not have tools.
3. Democritus
4. Democritus had the basic idea of atoms, even though he had no experimental evidence to support his thinking.
5. taught that there were substances called atoms and that these atoms made up all material things. The atoms were unchangeable, indestructible, and always existed.
Explanation:
hope this helps
Answer:
Rate = 0.001615 Ms-1
Explanation:
2 NO2 + F2 --> 2 NO2F
The reaction is first order with respect to NO2 and also first order with respect to F2.
The rate law is given as;
Rate = k [NO2] [ F2]
k = 1.58E-4 M-1s-1
[NO2] = 2.84 M
[F2] = 3.60 M
Rate = ?
Inserting the values into the equation, we have;
Rate = 1.58E-4 * 2.84 * 3.60
Rate = 0.001615 Ms-1
28.0 x 0.6424 = 18
25.0 x .6424 = 16.1
Mass = 34.1
