Answer:
Explanation:
Width of central diffraction peak is given by the following expression
Width of central diffraction peak= 2 λ D/ d₁
where d₁ is width of slit and D is screen distance and λ is wave length.
Width of other fringes become half , that is each of secondary diffraction fringe is equal to
λ D/ d₁
Width of central interference peak is given by the following expression
Width of each of bright fringe = λ D/ d₂
where d₂ is width of slit and D is screen distance and λ is wave length.
Now given that the central diffraction peak contains 13 interference fringes
so ( 2 λ D/ d₁) / λ D/ d₂ = 13
then ( λ D/ d₁) / λ D/ d₂ = 13 / 2
= 6.5
no of fringes contained within each secondary diffraction peak = 6.5
I believe it’s OH have a good day
<span>In my opinion, I myself believe that there are only two supernovae. The first is the white dwarf. It makes sense because if something is too big for its size, it will "explode". Just like a basketball with too much air. Massive star supernovae is like something has reached it's full potential and cannot get any bigger or better.</span>
The missing part of the incomplete question is given below:
Which important step of scientific design is Shameka conducting?
repetition
replication
verification of results
using controlled variables
Answer:
Verification of results
Explanation:
The way toward gathering five examples of water from various sources is conveyed to confirm the outcome. By gathering water from five distinct areas of a similar source the analyst can genuinely find out the nature of the water in her region of remain.
On the off chance that after examples are tried it is found the water isn't sound, the outcomes would be acknowledged as it has been appropriately checked and a proper move would be made.
Thus, the correct answer is - verification of results