The right half will be a new bar magnet of 2cm with north pole on the right side and south pole on teh left.
<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2><h2>A. Displacement</h2><h2>B. Time</h2><h2 /><h2>Your Welcome ❤</h2>
Practically yes
So
If mass is more output may come less so it affects the efficiency practically
But thepritically it doesn't
(a) 0.448
The gravitational potential energy of a satellite in orbit is given by:

where
G is the gravitational constant
M is the Earth's mass
m is the satellite's mass
r is the distance of the satellite from the Earth's centre, which is sum of the Earth's radius (R) and the altitude of the satellite (h):
r = R + h
We can therefore write the ratio between the potentially energy of satellite B to that of satellite A as

and so, substituting:

We find

(b) 0.448
The kinetic energy of a satellite in orbit around the Earth is given by

So, the ratio between the two kinetic energies is

Which is exactly identical to the ratio of the potential energies. Therefore, this ratio is also equal to 0.448.
(c) B
The total energy of a satellite is given by the sum of the potential energy and the kinetic energy:

For satellite A, we have

For satellite B, we have

So, satellite B has the greater total energy (since the energy is negative).
(d) 
The difference between the energy of the two satellites is:

Convert 220 lb to kg.
220/2.2 = 100kg.
W = Fd (In this case, F is the weight)
W = (100)(2)
W = 200J
P = W/t
P = (200)/(1.2)
P = 166.67W