Answer:
A new substance was formed
Explanation:
According to this question, a shiny and flexible metal called Magnesium (Mg) is burnt in air to produce a white powder that has no shiny or flexible properties, however, has more weight than the magnesium metal itself.
This is possible because a CHEMICAL CHANGE has occured, hence, a new substance has been formed. The formation of a new substance during the burning process (chemical reaction), induced the increase in mass.
Answer:
Explanation:
We shall apply law of conservation of momentum during the collision of ball A and B .
Total momentum before collision of A and B = .35 x 10 = 3.5 kg m/s
Let the velocity of B after collision be v .
Total momentum after collision = .35 x 2 + .35v
According to law of conservation of momentum
.35 x 2 + .35v = 3.5
.35 v = 2.8
v = 8 m /s .
The direction of B will be same as direction of A .
The representation of this problem is shown in Figure 1. So our goal is to find the vector

. From the figure we know that:

From geometry, we know that:

Then using
vector decomposition into components:

Therefore:

So if you want to find out <span>
how far are you from your starting point you need to know the magnitude of the vector

, that is:
</span>

Finally, let's find the <span>
compass direction of a line connecting your starting point to your final position. What we are looking for here is an angle that is shown in Figure 2 which is an angle defined with respect to the positive x-axis. Therefore:
</span>
Answer:

Explanation:
As we know that magnetic field due to torroid is given as

this is approximately constant magnetic field along the axis of the torroid
now the flux linked with one coil of the torroid is given as


now total flux of N number of coils is given as

now we know that self inductance is the property of coil in which flux of the coil will link with the current in the coil
So we know that


Answer:
First uncaused cause
Explanation:
Aristotle states that an infinite regression in the principle of causality is not possible. If the regression were infinite, then there would never be a first cause (mover), since this would need another mover to start its motion. Therefore, according to Aristotle, there must be an unmoved mover that moves other things, but is not itself moved by any prior action,