1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ELEN [110]
3 years ago
10

You are given a parallel plate capacitor that has plates of area 29 cm2 which are separated by 0.0100 mm of nylon (dielectric co

nstant κ = 3.4). You are told to assume that this capacitor stores 0.18 mC of charge.Calculate what the applied voltage in kV should be for this capacitor.
Physics
2 answers:
Verizon [17]3 years ago
6 0
<h2>Answer:</h2>

20.6kV

<h2>Explanation:</h2>

The capacitance (C₀) of a parallel plate capacitor is given by;

C₀ = A x ε₀ / d

Where;

A = Area of one of the plates = 29cm² = 0.0029m²

ε₀ = permittivity of free space = 8.85 x 10⁻¹²F/m

d = distance between the plates = 0.0100mm = 0.00001m

But since there is a dielectric material (nylon) between the plates, the effective capacitance (C) will increase to k x C₀.  i.e

C = k x C₀   -----------------------(i)

Where;

k = dielectric constant = 3.4 and;

C₀ = A x ε₀ / d

<em>Substitute the value of C₀ into equation (i) to give;</em>

C = k x A x ε₀ / d  -----------------(ii)

<em>Substitute the values of k, A, d and C₀ into equation (ii) to give;</em>

C = 3.4 x 0.0029 x 8.85 x 10⁻¹² / 0.00001

C = 8.7261 x 10⁻⁹ F

From the capacitance (C) calculated above, the amount of voltage(V) supplied can be found using the following relation;

Q = C x V         ------------------------------(iii)

Where Q is the charge on the capacitor = 0.18mC = 0.18 x 10⁻³C

<em>Make V the subject of the formula in equation (iii) above;</em>

V = Q / C

<em>Substitute the values of Q and C into the equation to give;</em>

V = (0.18 x 10⁻³) / (8.7261 x 10⁻⁹)

V = 0.0206 x 10⁶V

V = 20600V

V = 20.6kV

Therefore, the voltage applied in kV is 20.6

GalinKa [24]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

20.60 kV

Explanation:

Capacitance of parallel plates without dielectric between them is:

C=\frac{\varepsilon_{0}A}{d}

with d the distance between the plates, A the area of the plates and ε₀ the constant 8.85419\times10^{-12}\frac{C^{2}}{Nm^{2}}, so :

C_0=\frac{(8.85419\times10^{-12})(0.0029)}{0.0100\times10^{-3}}=2.57\times10^{-9} F

But the dielectric constant is defined as:

k=\frac{C}{C_{0}}

With C the effective capacitance (with the dielectric) and Co the original capacitance (without the dielectric). So, the new capacitance is:

C=kC_0

But capacitance is related with voltage by:

C=\frac{Q}{V}

with Q the charge and V the voltage, using the new capacitance and solving for V:

kC_0=\frac{Q}{V}

V=\frac{Q}{kC_0}=\frac{0.18\times10{-3}}{(3.4)(2.57\times10^{-9})}=20599.68V=20.60 kV

You might be interested in
At a pressure of one billionth (10–9) of atmospheric pressure, there are about 2.7 × 1010 molecules in one cubic centimeter of a
Sergeeva-Olga [200]

Answer:

Required answer =  2.7 x 10^16 MOLECULES

Explanation:

We know that

1 m = 100 cm

so 1 m^3 = (100 cm)^3 = 1000000 cm^3 = 1 x 10^6 cm3

as per question, 2.7*10^{10} molecules in 1 cm^3

so number of molecules in 1 m^3

Number of molecules = ( 2.7 x 10^10 molecules /1 cm^3 ) x ( 1 x 10^6 cm3 / 1 m3)

Number of molecules = 2.7 x 10^10 x 1 x 10^6 = 2.7 x 10^16 per m3

Required answer =  2.7 x 10^16 MOLECULES

3 0
3 years ago
Date
sergiy2304 [10]

Answer:

Because Kinetic Energy(KE) is not the same as Momentum(P)

Kinetic Energy is a scalar(has magnitude only). For a body of mass M, velocity V:

KE = 0.5MV^2

The units of KE: Joules.

Energy is the ability to do work.

Momentum is not a form of energy.

Momentum is a vector(has magnitude and direction).

P = MV

Units of momentum: kg m/s

If you have rifles of mass 2, 4, 8, 16 kg, using the same cartridge, with the same load, barrel length(remember momentum of projectile is proportional to velocity), they all have the same recoil momentum.

But the kinetic energy of recoil would be inversely proportional to the mass of the gun.

Thus the 2kg gun(possible even in large powerful calibers due to modern materials like titanium etc), would have 8 times the recoil ENERGY of the 16kg gun.

A lot of confusion exists in America because of retention of old units, namely Foot Pounds(force) for KE, and Pounds(mass) Feet Per Second for Momentum(P). Because of the more awkward momentum units, a lot of old books had a bad habit of calling the momentum units Pounds Feet, leaving out the rest. Naturally this created confusion with Foot Pounds. Multiplication being commutative and all that:).

Remember that the momentum of the rifles is the same. But the ones with the highest recoil energy hurt the most.

Speaking of hurt:

If momentum killed, then consider two dinosaur killer asteroids with the same masses and velocities, striking vertically at the same time antipodal points on the Earth’s surface. Total momentum delivered would be Zero. That would not make us safe at all:)

Similarly, being shot simultaneously at close range from opposite sides with a 5 round burst from each from two M4 assault rifles(by definition must be able to fire full auto) delivered in 0.3 seconds, would deliver zero momentum. But not zero harm.

Also, the recoil momentum of any firearm is equal to the mass of projectile x velocity + mass of propellant x exit velocity of propellant. This is obviously greater, often much greater, depending on range, than the striking momentum of the projectile at the target.

The recoil kinetic energy is vastly less than the kinetic energy of the bullet/projectile. Neglecting propellant contribution:

recoil Momentum = bullet momentum

BUT:

recoil KE/bullet KE = projectile mass/gun mass

This is a very small fraction.

If we consider the M4 carried by American military:

M855(SS109 equivalent) 5.56 bullet of mass 0.004kg(62 grains)is fired from M4 assault rifle of mass, with optic and full mag 4kg, a thousand times as much!

Even allowing for the 0.0015kg powder charge, and the higher velocity of the powder(approx 1400=1500 m/s vs approx 900 m/s muzzle velocity of the bullet), the recoil energy is hundreds of times less than the muzzle energy of the bullet.

That’s why you want to be behind the gun, and not in front.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
If a toy car has a centripetal acceleration of 50 m/s2 and was making the turn at 10 m/s. what was his radius
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

Explanation:

The centripetal acceleration is expressed as;

a = v²/r

a is the acceleration = 50m/s²

v is the velocity = 10m/s

r is the radius

To get the radius

r = v²/a

r = 10²/50

r = 100/50

r = 2m

Hence its radius is 2m

3 0
3 years ago
A ball thrown into the air has its greatest kinetic energy as it reaches the highest point in its path. please select the best a
postnew [5]
F - False.

Its greatest kinetic energy is at the point of release.

It has the least kinetic energy, zero, at its highest point in its path.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List important agents,or causes of erosion
Reil [10]
Erosion is caused naturally by water, wind or gravity, and accelerated erosion is caused by human use of land.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Need an answer fast
    11·1 answer
  • Which type of radio waves have the highest frequency and are used in radar detection? microwaves x-rays waves infrared waves gam
    13·2 answers
  • A ball is fired vertically into the air. Its height in feet t seconds later is given by the formula: h(t)= -2t^2+80t
    14·1 answer
  • A roller coaster train with a mass of 500 kg stops at the top of a hill. If the hill is 110 m high, what is the potential energy
    11·2 answers
  • What is the resultant resistance of the circuit in the image shown?
    12·1 answer
  • Please need help on this
    8·1 answer
  • Which bone is located in the thigh or upper hind limb, articulating at the hip or knee?
    9·1 answer
  • A. If an electron of 16 eV had a head-on collision with a Cs atom at rest, what would be the kinetic energy in eV) of the recoil
    15·1 answer
  • What thermodynamic property describes the relationship of an equilibrium to temperature?
    6·1 answer
  • Pls solve this numerical.​
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!