Answer:
1) The exergy of destruction is approximately 456.93 kW
2) The reversible power output is approximately 5456.93 kW
Explanation:
1) The given parameters are;
P₁ = 8 MPa
T₁ = 500°C
From which we have;
s₁ = 6.727 kJ/(kg·K)
h₁ = 3399 kJ/kg
P₂ = 2 MPa
T₂ = 350°C
From which we have;
s₂ = 6.958 kJ/(kg·K)
h₂ = 3138 kJ/kg
P₃ = 2 MPa
T₃ = 500°C
From which we have;
s₃ = 7.434 kJ/(kg·K)
h₃ = 3468 kJ/kg
P₄ = 30 KPa
T₄ = 69.09 C (saturation temperature)
From which we have;
h₄ =
+ x₄×
= 289.229 + 0.97*2335.32 = 2554.49 kJ/kg
s₄ =
+ x₄×
= 0.94394 + 0.97*6.8235 ≈ 7.563 kJ/(kg·K)
The exergy of destruction,
, is given as follows;
= T₀ ×
= T₀ ×
× (s₄ + s₂ - s₁ - s₃)
= T₀ ×
×(s₄ + s₂ - s₁ - s₃)/(h₁ + h₃ - h₂ - h₄)
∴
= 298.15 × 5000 × (7.563 + 6.958 - 6.727 - 7.434)/(3399 + 3468 - 3138 - 2554.49) ≈ 456.93 kW
The exergy of destruction ≈ 456.93 kW
2) The reversible power output,
=
+
≈ 5000 + 456.93 kW = 5456.93 kW
The reversible power output ≈ 5456.93 kW.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
This is a two sample t-test and not a matched pair t-test
null hypothesis(H0) will be that mean energy consumed by copper rotor motors is greater than or equal to mean energy consumed by aluminium rotor motors
alternate hypothesis(H1) will be that mean energy consumed by copper rotor motors is less than or equal to mean energy consumed by aluminium rotor motors.
So, option D is rejected
The hypothesis will not compare mean of differences of values of energy consumed by copper rotor motor and aluminium rotor motor.
Option A and C are also rejected
Answer:
Reduce manufacturing costs.
Explanation:
Hope This Helps
Have A Great Day
Answer:
R= 1.25
Explanation:
As given the local heat transfer,

But we know as well that,

Replacing the values

Reynolds number is define as,

Where V is the velocity of the fluid and \upsilon is the Kinematic viscosity
Then replacing we have



<em>*Note that A is just a 'summary' of all of that constat there.</em>
<em>That is
</em>
Therefore at x=L the local convection heat transfer coefficient is

Definen that we need to find the average convection heat transfer coefficient in the entire plate lenght, so

The ratio of the average heat transfer coefficient over the entire plate to the local convection heat transfer coefficient is
