Yes it could, but you'd have to set up the process very carefully.
I see two major challenges right away:
1). Displacement of water would not be a wise method, since rock salt
is soluble (dissolves) in water. So as soon as you start lowering it into
your graduated cylinder full of water, its volume would immediately start
to decrease. If you lowered it slowly enough, you might even measure
a volume close to zero, and when you pulled the string back out of the
water, there might be nothing left on the end of it.
So you would have to choose some other fluid besides water ... one in
which rock salt doesn't dissolve. I don't know right now what that could
be. You'd have to shop around and find one.
2). Whatever fluid you did choose, it would also have to be less dense
than rock salt. If it's more dense, then the rock salt just floats in it, and
never goes all the way under. If that happens, then you have a tough
time measuring the total volume of the lump.
So the displacement method could perhaps be used, in principle, but
it would not be easy.
Answer:
91383 J
Explanation:
The equation of the reaction can be represented as:
------>
Given that:
The standard enthalpy of formation of NO(g) is 91.3 kJ⋅mol−1 at 298.15 K.
The equation below shown the reaction between the enthalpy of reaction at a particular temperature to another.
= 
where:
= enthalpy of reaction
= the difference in the heat capacities of the products and the reactants.
∴
=

= ![1(91300 J.mol^{-1} ) +\int\limits^{435}_{298.15} [{(29.86)-\frac{1}{2}(29.38)-\frac{1}{2}29.13}]J.K^{-1}.mol^{-1} \, dT'](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=1%2891300%20J.mol%5E%7B-1%7D%20%29%20%2B%5Cint%5Climits%5E%7B435%7D_%7B298.15%7D%20%5B%7B%2829.86%29-%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%2829.38%29-%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D29.13%7D%5DJ.K%5E%7B-1%7D.mol%5E%7B-1%7D%20%5C%2C%20dT%27)
= 91300 J + (0.605 J.K⁻¹)(435-298.15)K
= 91382.79 J
≅ 91383 J
Answer:
B. 1-heptene
Explanation:
The 1-HEPTENE molecule contains a total of 20 bond(s) There are 6 non-H bond(s), 1 multiple bond(s), 4 rotatable bond(s) and 1 double bond(s).
Answer:- 3.
and 
Explanations:- An empirical formula is the simplest whole number ratio of atoms of each element present in the molecule/compound.
For example, the molecular formula of benzene is
. The ratio of C to H in it is 6:6 that could be simplified to 1:1. So, an empirical formula of benzene is CH.
In the first pair, the ratio of C to H in first molecule is 2:4 that could be simplified to 1:2 and the empirical formula is
. In second molecule the ratio of C to H is 6:6 and it could be simplified to 1:1. and the empirical formula is CH. Empirical formulas are different for both the molecules of first pair and so it is not the right choice.
In second pair, C to H ratio in first molecule is 1:2, so the empirical formula is
. The C to H ratio for second molecule is 1:4, so the empirical formula is
. Here also, the empirical formulas are not same and hence it is also not the right choice.
In third pair, C to H ratio in first molecule is 1:3, so the empirical formula is
. In second molecule the C to H ratio is 2:6 and it is simplified to 1:3. So, the empirical formula for this one is also
. Hence. this is the correct choice.
In fourth pair, first molecule empirical formula is CH. Second molecule has 2:4 that is 1:2 mole ratio of C to H and so its empirical formula is
. As the empirical formulas are different, it is not the right choice.
So, the only and only correct pair is the third one. 3.
and 