Answer:
The leaves of the electroscope move further apart.
Explanation:
This is what happens; when the positive object is brought near the top, negative charges migrating from the gold leaves to the top. This is because the negative charges in the gold are attracted by the positive charge. Thus, it leaves behind a net positive charge on the leaves, though the scope remains neutral overall. To that effect, the leaves repel each other and move apart. If a finger touches the top of the electroscope at the moment when the positive object remains near the top, it basically grounds the electroscope and thus the net positive charge in the leaves flows to the ground through the finger. However, the positive object continues to "hold" negative charges in place at the top. Ar this moment the gold leaves have lost their net positive charge, so they no longer repel, and they move closer together. If the positive object is moved away, the negative charges at the top are no longer attracted to the top, and they redistribute themselves throughout the electroscope, moving into the leaves and charging them negatively.
Thus, the leaves move apart from each other again and we now have a negatively charged electroscope. If a negatively charged object is now brought close to the top, but without touching, the negative charges already in the electroscope will be repelled down toward the leaves, thereby making them more negative, causing them to repel more, and hence move even further apart.
So, the leaves move further apart.
Answer:
Negatively charged, to positively charged parts
Explanation:
Electrons are negative, negative is attracted to positive.
The reasoning is wrong if we look into Newton's Law of gravitation.
Newton's law of gravitation states that every particle in the universe attracts every other particle with a force that is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between their centers.
The law is written as follows;


The distance between the two particles, is a function of force and their masses not necessarily time of motion.
In the given problem only time of motion was considered which is wrong.
Thus, the reasoning is wrong if we look into Newton's Law of gravitation.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/19680441
Answer:isotopes
Explanation:Isotopes form when the number of neutrons and atomic number change except for the protons don't change