Answer: A- Workers and Firms May not have rational expectations.
According the utilitarian approach actions and plans should be taken<span> in a way that will produce the greatest benefit to society and produce the least harm at lowest cost and</span> judged by their consequences. The utilitarian approach proposes that actions and plans should be judged by their consequences. research reveals that stakeholders who have the ability to affect the company have the most power; whereas stakeholders that have legitimacy have a legal or moral claim on company resources.
Answer:
B. requires first developing the ability to do something, however imperfectly or inefficiently perform their assigned activities in a tightly-prescribed manner developed by the company's foremost technical experts second, translating this ability into a tried-and-true competence and/or capability by learning to do the activity consistently well and at an acceptable cost, and then continuing to polish, refine, and sharpen their performance of the competence or capability, striving not just for ongoing improvements but, ultimately, for best-in-industry or best-in-world proficiency
Explanation:
If a company chooses to develop it's competencies and capabilities internally and not externally by maybe choosing to outsource experts or merging or collaborating with companies with required competence and expertise, then they would have to follow through with the process of developing and nurturing internal capability and competencies. To proceed with internal competence, a company would need to hire experts if there are none in the company, these experts would train staff who follow through with the process in the option chosen above.
Answer:
MIRR -16.50%
They should reject the project is it destroys capital it do not meet to pay up the cost of the investment.
A typical firm’s IRR will be greater than its MIR
If the project yields higher than the cost of capital the IRR will be higher than the MIRR as reinvest the cashflow at the project yield rather than copany's cost of capital, thus it overstate the return.
Explanation:

WACC (cost of capital, reinvestment and financiation rate) = 7%
<em>Cash inflow:</em>
Year 1 275000 336,886.825
Year 3 450000 481500
Year 4 450000 450000
Total 1,268,386.825
<em>Cash outflow:</em>
F= -2,500,000
Year 2 -125000 - 109, 179.841
Total 2,609,179.841
Now we can solve for MIRR:
![MIRR = \sqrt[n]{\frac{FV \: inflow}{PV \: outflow}} -1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=MIRR%20%3D%20%5Csqrt%5Bn%5D%7B%5Cfrac%7BFV%20%5C%3A%20inflow%7D%7BPV%20%5C%3A%20outflow%7D%7D%20-1)
![MIRR = \sqrt[4]{\frac{1,268,386.82}{2,609,179.84}} -1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=MIRR%20%3D%20%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%2C268%2C386.82%7D%7B2%2C609%2C179.84%7D%7D%20-1)
MIRR - 16.49991% = -16.50%