The reason why the number I calculated for Avogadro’s number may match the actual number is because the comparison of the number of molecules in the top layer to the number of moles in the top layer is the definition of Avogadro’s number. It is the amount of molecules in a mole <span>of any given substance.</span>
Answer: The empirical formula for the given compound is 
Explanation : Given,
Mass of product = 0.963 g
Mass of Cr = 0.500 g
Mass of S = 0.963 g - 0.500 g = 0.463 g
To formulate the empirical formula, we need to follow some steps:
Step 1: Converting the given masses into moles.
Moles of Cr =
Moles of S = 
Step 2: Calculating the mole ratio of the given elements.
For the mole ratio, we divide each value of the moles by the smallest number of moles calculated which is 0.00962 moles.
For Cr = 
For S = 
To make in a whole number we are multiplying the ratio by 2, we get:
The ratio of Cr : S = 1 : 1.5
The ratio of Cr : S = 2 : 3
Step 3: Taking the mole ratio as their subscripts.
The ratio of Cr : S = 2 : 3
Hence, the empirical formula for the given compound is 
The number of moles of aluminium that are needed to react completely with 13.2 moles of FeO is 8.8 moles
calculation
2Al + 3FeO → 3aFe +Al2O3
by use of of mole ratio of Al: FeO from equation above = 2:3 the moles of Al is therefore
= 13.2 x 2/3=8.8 moles of Al
This problem is providing us with the chemical equation depicting the production of ammonia from nitrogen and hydrogen at equilibrium and asks for the correct change when the concentration of nitrogen is increased. At the end, the answer is the forward reaction would increase to start reducing the concentration of N2.
<h3>Chemical equilibrium</h3>
In chemistry, chemical reactions not always reach a 100-% conversion when reactants get in contact in order to carry out the chemical reaction. Thus, there is a point wherein the concentrations remain the same and is called equilibrium.
In such a way, for this problem, we have the following chemical reaction at equilibrium:

Now, according to the Le Ch.atelier's principle, an increase in the concentration of any species, shifts the equilibrium away from it, which means that if we increase the concentration of nitrogen, a reactant, the forward reaction will be favored.
Thereby, the correct answer is "the forward reaction would increase to start reducing the concentration of N2".
Learn more about chemical equilibrium: brainly.com/question/26453983
Answer:
The answer to your question is the second one
Explanation:
AC + B → AB + C
This is not the right answer, the reaction shown here is a single replacement reaction in which one element replaces another element that is part of a compound.
A + B + C → ABC
This is the right answer because in synthesis reactions two or more reactants bound to form only one product.
ABC → A + B + C
This answer is incorrect because this is an example of a decomposition reaction in which one reactant forms two or more products.
AB + CD → AC + BD
This is an example of double replacement reaction in which the cations and anions of the reactants are interchanged.