Answer:
One of the most common criticisms of Stanley Milgram’s studies of obedience is that the results of his experiment do not represent actual tendencies to obey the authority due to the participants of it probably knowing everything was okay, another example is that it has been considered in an unethical study in which he had lied to the respondents.
Explanation:
Researchers who take a biological viewpoint examine the influence of genetics and neurobiological factors on aggression.
<h3>Who is a researcher?</h3>
This is the name that is used to refer to the person that is involved in the carrying out of research in order to unravel the reasons for the existence of certain phenomena in the society or in the environment.
The people that are biological researchers are those that are involved in carrying out the research that has to do with the genetics and other aspects of human biology or the study of organisms.
Read more on research here: brainly.com/question/968894
#SPJ4
Europe is a *multicultural* region because it has many different ethnic groups and languages.
Well, it could remind police to be careful of how they
conduct their operations in the future.
They should learn from their mistakes and make sure not to let it happen
again. On the other hand, the police
might feel that they are being watched and they cannot do what needs to be done
when the situation calls for it.
Appellate jurisdiction means that the Court has the authority to review the decisions of lower courts. The United States district courts are the trial courts of the federal court system. This is where federal cases are tried, where witnesses testify, and federal juries serve. There are 94 federal district courts in the United States. Most of the cases the Supreme Court hears are appeals from lower courts.
I think it's necessary. We live in a society in the process of building a democracy accessible to all people. Like every process, we are subject to failure. The justice system has been questioned by social movements about their decisions, often considered unfair. In this way, the possibility of appealing to a new analysis of the case is important so that some decisions are reviewed.
