Answer:
-2? if wrong im sorry please tell me what I did that was incorrect ty Explanation:
The correct answer is:
d) No, it is not feasible. three metallic ions cannot provide the exact number of electrons that one sulfur needs for the ionic bond.
Because Sulfur is divalent so it need to gain 2 electrons from metal so if we have 3 metals they can't provide only two electrons only.
Answer:
![\frac{[F^{-}]}{[HF]}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B%5BF%5E%7B-%7D%5D%7D%7B%5BHF%5D%7D)
is larger
Explanation:
, where 
is the acid dissociation constant.
For a monoprotic acid e.g. HA, ![K_{a}=\frac{[H^{+}][A^{-}]}{[HA]}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K_%7Ba%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7B%5BH%5E%7B%2B%7D%5D%5BA%5E%7B-%7D%5D%7D%7B%5BHA%5D%7D)
and ![\frac{[A^{-}]}{[HA]}=\frac{K_{a}}{[H^{+}]}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B%5BA%5E%7B-%7D%5D%7D%7B%5BHA%5D%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7BK_%7Ba%7D%7D%7B%5BH%5E%7B%2B%7D%5D%7D)
So, clearly, higher the value , lower will the the 
In this mixture, at equilibrium, ![[H^{+}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BH%5E%7B%2B%7D%5D)
will be constant.
of HF is grater than of HCN
Hence, ![(\frac{F^{-}}{[HF]}=\frac{K_{a}(HF)}{[H^{+}]})>(\frac{CN^{-}}{[HCN]}=\frac{K_{a}(HCN)}{[H^{+}]})](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%28%5Cfrac%7BF%5E%7B-%7D%7D%7B%5BHF%5D%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7BK_%7Ba%7D%28HF%29%7D%7B%5BH%5E%7B%2B%7D%5D%7D%29%3E%28%5Cfrac%7BCN%5E%7B-%7D%7D%7B%5BHCN%5D%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7BK_%7Ba%7D%28HCN%29%7D%7B%5BH%5E%7B%2B%7D%5D%7D%29)
So, is larger
Answer:
M = 1.26
Explanation:
Molarity = mole of solution/liters of solution
435mL/1000 = .435L
Plugging in the numbers into the formula, we get:
Molarity = .550 mol/.435L = 1.26 M
2. Rubidium
3. Antimony
4. Ytterbium
5. Einsteinium
