All categories

3 years ago

HELP 50 POINTS TO ANY WHO GETS THIS RIGHT

Physics

1 answer:

Anuta_ua [19.1K]3 years ago

5 0

<h2>Positive Affects:</h2>

Technology aids in the research of curing diseases or other environmental problems. Without technology, we would not have been able to eradicate diseases like polio.
Technology allows us to communicate to people quicker, in spite of the distance and conditions.

<h2>Negative</h2>

Over-dependence of technology makes humans lazy. We won't be paying much attention because everything is available on Google.
There are health affects due to the radiation. Our vision gets weakened and the laziness can lead to physical problems like obesity and fatigue.

You might be interested in

Two uncharged metal spheres, #1 and #2, are mounted on insulating support rods. A third metal sphere, carrying a positive charge

Katen [24]

Answer:

sphere #1 carries positive charge and #2 carries negative charge

This is because from the laws of static electricity, disconnecting the copper wire makes #1 to be positively charged and #2 to be negatively charged

7 0

3 years ago

A group of physics students hypothesize that for an experiment they are performing, the speed of an object sliding down an incli

goblinko [34]

Answer:

v = 2.974

Explanation:

Perhaps the formula should be

v = √(2*g*d (sin(θ) - uk*cos(θ) ) This is a bit easier to read.

v = √(2* 9.80*0.725(0.707 - 0.12*0.707) ) Substitute values. Find 2*g*d

v = √14.21 * (0.707 - 0.0849) Figure out Sin(θ) - uk cos(θ)

v = √14.21 * (0.6222)

v = √8.8422 Take the square root of the value

v = 2.974

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A 225-kg object and a 525-kg object are separated by 3.80 m. (a) Find the magnitude of the net gravitational force exerted by th

pav-90 [236]

Answer: $F_{net}=3.383\times 10^{-7}\ N$

Explanation:

Given

Mass of first object $m_1=225\ kg$

Mass of second object $m_2=525\ kg$

Distance between them $d=3.8\ m$

$m_3=61\ kg$ object is placed between them

So force exerted by $m_1$ on $m_3$

$F_{13}=\frac{Gm_1m_3}{1.9^2}$

$F_{13}=\frac{6.674\times 10^{-11}(225\times 61)}{1.9^2}$

$F_{13}=2.5374141274×10^{−7}\ N$

Force exerted by $m_2\ on\ m_3$

$F_{23}=\frac{Gm_2m_3}{1.9^2}$

$F_{23}=\frac{6.674\times 10^{-11}(525\times 61)}{1.9^2}$

$F_{23}=5.920632964\times 10^{-7}\ N$

So net force on $m_3$ is

$F_{net}=F_{23}-F_{13}$

$F_{net}=5.920632964\times 10^{-7}-2.5374141274\times 10^{-7}$

$F_{net}=3.383\times 10^{-7}\ N$

i.e. net force is towards $m_2$

(b)For net force to be zero on $m_3$ , suppose

So force exerted by $m_1$ and $m_2$ must be equal

$F_{13}=F_{23}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{Gm_1m_3}{x^2}=\frac{Gm_2m_3}{(3.8-x)^2}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{m_1}{x^2}=\frac{m_2}{(3.8-x)^2}$

$\Rightarrow (\frac{3.8-x}{x})^2=\frac{m_2}{m_1}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{3.8-x}{x}=\sqrt{\frac{525}{225}}$

$\Rightarrow 3.8-x=1.52752x$

$\Rightarrow 3.8=2.52x$

$\Rightarrow x=1.507\ m$

4 0

3 years ago

Why would the planets move in a straight path if there was no gravitational energy from the sun

omeli [17]

Explanation:

The sun's gravitational force is very strong. If it were not, a planet would move in a straight line out into space. The sun's gravity pulls the planet toward the sun, which changes the straight line of direction into a curve. This keeps the planet moving in an orbit around the sun

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST IF SOMEONE GETS THIS......

pav-90 [236]

Answer:

Explanation:

Firstly to calculate the total mass of the can before the metal was lowered we need to add the mass of the eureka can and the mass of the water in the can. We don't know the mass of the water but we can easily find if we know the volume of the can. In order to calculate the volume we would have to multiply the area of the cross section by the height. So we do the following.

100 $cm^{2}$ x 10cm = 1000 $cm^{3}$

Now in order to find the mass that water has in this case we have to multiply the water's density by the volume, and so we get....

$\frac{1g}{cm^{3} }$ x 1000 $cm^{3}$ = 1000g or 1kg

Knowing this, we now can calculate the total mass of the can before the metal was lowered, by adding the mass of the water to the mass of the can. So we get....

1000g + 100g = 1100g or 1.1kg

The volume of the water that over flowed will be equal to the volume of the metal piece (since when we add the metal piece, the metal piece will force out the same volume of water as itself, to understand this more deeply you can read the about "Archimedes principle"). Knowing this we just have to calculate the volume of the metal piece an that will be the answer. So this time in order to find volume we will have to divide the total mass of the metal piece by its density. So we get....

20g ÷ $\frac{8g}{cm^{3} }$ = 2.5 $cm^{3}$

Now to find out the total mass of the can after the metal piece was lowered we would have to add the mass of the can itself, mass of the water inside the can, and the mass of the metal piece. We know the mass of the can, and the metal piece but we don't know the mass of the water because when we lowered the metal piece some of the water overflowed, and as a result the mass of the water changed. So now we just have to find the mass of the water in the can keeping in mind the fact that 2.5 $cm^{3}$ overflowed. So now we the same process as in number a) just with a few adjustments.

$\frac{1g}{cm^{3} }$ x (1000 $cm^{3}$ - 2.5 $cm^{3}$ ) = 997.5g

So now that we know the mass of the water in the can after we added the metal piece we can add all the three masses together (the mass of the can. the mass of the water, and the mass of the metal piece) and get the answer.

100g + 997.5g + 20g = 1117.5g or 1.1175kg

5 0

3 years ago