Answer:
i feel like it would be four
Explanation:
Srr if i was wrong
In a way, all of the answers could be argued for (for example: in the first option: if the scientists' opinions are understood to be "informed understanding of the causes of events"), but one of the options is the best:
Scientific laws describe specific relationships in nature without offering
an explanation.
The reason why I think this is true is that many laws are phased too short and too concise to provide comprehensive explanations, instead they describe the relationships that must hold.
One of the options is pplain false:
Scientific laws explain why natural events occur. -"Scientific laws were theories that have been tested, proven, and adopted as laws." - since they are not adopted as laws.
Im pretty sure the anservis a
An atom consists of three sub atomic particles which are protons, neutrons, and electrons. ... This nucleus is surrounded by the electrons as electrons revolve around the nucleus. Thus, we can conclude that out of the given options, a core of protons and neutrons surrounded by electrons best describes an atom.
and y'all still In school?
