Answer:
<u>-3.45</u> is closer to -3
Step-by-step explanation:
because, since it's negative the closer the negative number is closer to 0 its number is lower (-) like -4 is farther away from the 0 than -3.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Numerator
sin
x
cos
y
+
cos
x
sin
y
−
[
sin
x
cos
y
−
cos
x
sin
y
)
=
sin
x
cos
y
+
cos
x
sin
y
−
sin
x
cos
y
+
cos
x
sin
y
=
2
cos
x
sin
y
Denominator
cos
x
cos
y
−
sin
x
sin
y
+
cos
x
cos
y
+
sin
x
sin
y
=
cos
x
cos
y
−
sin
x
sin
y
+
cos
x
cos
y
+
sin
x
sin
y
=
2
cos
x
cos
y
---------------------------------------------------------------
left side can now be expressed as
2
cos
x
sin
y
2
cos
x
cos
y
=
2
cos
x
sin
y
2
cos
x
cos
y
=
sin
y
cos
y
and
sin
y
cos
y
=
tan
y
=
right side hence proved
Answer:
No, Lance's thinking is wrong because you cannot compare decimal numbers with alphabetizing words. For example, if we compare 37.6 to 7.42 using the method of Lance, we would probably say 37.6 is less than 7.42 because 3 is less than 7. But it is wrong. The 3 in 37.6 is in the tens place. On the other hand, 7.42 contains no tense. Therefore, 37.6 is actually higher.
Step-by-step explanation:
No, Lance's thinking is wrong because you cannot compare decimal numbers with alphabetizing words. For example, if we compare 37.6 to 7.42 using the method of Lance, we would probably say 37.6 is less than 7.42 because 3 is less than 7. But it is wrong. The 3 in 37.6 is in the tens place. On the other hand, 7.42 contains no tense. Therefore, 37.6 is actually higher.
Answer: Part-to-part
Step-by-step explanation:
This is a part-to-part, because they show part of apples, and part of oranges. This ratio when set up is 4:3. If the ratio was part-to-whole, then the apples would be compared to the total amount of oranges and apples. The ratio for part-to-whole would be 4:7.
Hope this helps!
