Answer:
A triangle
Step-by-step explanation: The two squares lean against each other
We know that
in the first triangle
the ratio of the legs are
4.5/1.5-----> 3
then
case <span>A) 6 m and 2 m ------> ratio=6/3----> 3
so
</span><span>the legs of a second triangle are proportional to the lengths of the legs of the first triangle
</span>case B) 8 m and 5 m ------> ratio=8/5---->1.6
so
the legs of a second triangle are not proportional to the lengths of the legs of the first triangle
case C) 7 m and 3.5 mm ------> ratio=7/3.5---->2
so
the legs of a second triangle are not proportional to the lengths of the legs of the first triangle
case D) 10 m and 2.5 m ------> ratio=10/2.5---->4
so
the legs of a second triangle are not proportional to the lengths of the legs of the first triangle
case E) 11.25 m and 3.75 m ------> ratio=11.25/3.75---->3
so
the legs of a second triangle are proportional to the lengths of the legs of the first triangle
the answer is
A) 6 m and 2 m
E) 11.25 m and 3.75 m
Answer:
It isn't a proportional relationship
Step-by-step explanation:
It's not a proportional relationship because you would have to divide both numbers on the chart by a number they both have in common and when you divide them and it doesn't equal 0 then it is not a proportional relationship.
Answer:
its b I'm pretty sure. it makes the most sense i
Answer:
F:13
Both S and F= 20
S:23
Dont study:4
Step-by-step explanation:
