One of the last openly segregationist politicians in Georgia was Lester Maddox.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not have any statements or options, we can say that the Supreme Court's rationale for the decision in McDonald v Chicago was that the Court reversed the decision made by the 7th. Circuit, explaining that the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution supports the right including in the 2nd Amendment to have weapons for the self-protection of the citizen in all the states of the Union. So yes, the 2nd. Amendment to the United States Constitution applies to the states. The case McDonald v Chicago was decided on June 18, 2010.
Explanation:
i hope it helps ..........
laws like these weren't really implemented in the north but were popular in the south because the south still had slavery until 1863, and because they wanted to deter slaves from running aware and also they wanted to keep control of what they had and of their property/slaves.
racism was rampant during the time against blacks because african americans didn't have rights at the time so they couldn't stand up for themselves or anything like that.
This suggestion reflects a concern with causal mechanisms. The Causal mechanism is the procedures or passageways over which an outcome is taken into being. There are two broad types of theories of causation which is the Humean theory which is causation as regularities and the causal-realist theory which is causation as a causal mechanism. The Humean theory embraces that causation is completely established by facts about empirical regularities among noticeable variables in which there is no fundamental causal nature, causal power or causal necessity while the causal-realist takes concepts of causal mechanisms and causal powers as essential, and holds that the undertaking of scientific research is to attain at empirically defensible theories and hypotheses about those causal mechanisms.
