Answer: Simulation.
Explanation:
Simulation when used for training is a method of creating a controlled environment that resembles a real world situation, where an individual is required to use their knowledge in an area to solve problems while also learning in the process.
Simulation in most cases, is applied to train individuals present in departments which requires perfection in decision making in real life situations.
Answer: True
Explanation: Jimmy Carter, elected president in 1977 campaigned as an outsider who did not favor the backroom deals that were common in Washington politics. Although this won him an election, maintaining this view as president resulted in a relationship that deteriorated quickly with Congress.
During his presidency, energy prices and taxes increased, and he fired or several cabinet officials. He also gave a speech where he blamed these problems on Americans' lack of confidence and community spirit. A combination of these made him lose his popularity with the American people over time.
Answer:Sumerian farmers' invention of the plow helped them provide their city-states with a stable food supply. Before farmers invented the plow, they used animal horns or pointed sticks to poke holes in the earth.
Explanation:
the President is responsible for implementing and enforcing laws ,so the head of federal agencies are appointed.
There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
