Answer:
If a substance undergoes a physical change, then it will retain most of its original properties because no new substance is formed.
If a substance undergoes a chemical change, then it will not retain its original properties because a new substance is formed.
Explanation:
So in shorter words its options 2 and 3
<span>The elastic potential energy stored in the stretched rubber band changes to kinetic energy.</span>
Just choose 3
1) Lakes can form in hollows left by meteorite impacts (e.g. Clearwater Lakes, Quebec, Canada).
2) Lakes can form in the craters formed by volcanoes (e.g. Crater Lake, Oragon)
3) Lakes can form when a river is damed by a natural rock fall or man (e.g. Lake Mede)
4) Lakes can form where glaciers have scooped out the rock from the floor of a valley (e.g. Lake Geneva)
5) Lakes can form where block faulting lowers the land (e.g. lake Baikal)
6) lakes can form in natural depressions in the land (e.g. Lake Victoria)
Answer:
D.Lowering the temperature is the best option.
Explanation:
The value of equilibrium constants aren't changed with change in the pressure or concentrations of reactants and products in equilibrium. The only thing that changes the value of equilibrium constant is a change of temperature.
In the reaction below for example;
A + B <==>C+D
If you have moved the position of the equilibrium to the right (and so increased the amount of C and D), why hasn't the equilibrium constant increased?
Let's assume that the equilibrium constant mustn't change if you decrease the concentration of C - because equilibrium constants are constant at constant temperature. Why does the position of equilibrium move as it does?
If you decrease the concentration or pressure of C, the top of the Kc expression gets smaller. That would change the value of Kc. In order for that not to happen, the concentrations of C and D will have to increase again, and those of A and B must decrease. That happens until a new balance is reached when the value of the equilibrium constant expression reverts to what it was before.
Answer:
5.7 moles of O2
Explanation:
We'll begin by writing the balanced decomposition equation for the reaction. This is illustrated below:
2KClO3 —> 2KCl + 3O2
From the balanced equation above,
2 moles of KClO3 decomposed to produce 3 moles of O2.
Next, we shall determine the number of mole of O2 produced by the reaction of 3.8 moles of KClO3.
Since 100% yield of O2 is obtained, it means that both the actual yield and theoretical yield of O2 are the same. Thus, we can obtain the number of mole of O2 produced as follow:
From the balanced equation above,
2 moles of KClO3 decomposed to produce 3 moles of O2.
Therefore, 3.8 moles of KClO3 will decompose to produce = (3.8 × 3)/2 = 5.7 moles of O2.
Thus, 5.7 moles of O2 were obtained from the reaction.
