1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mina [271]
4 years ago
15

How have the competing explanations' experiments on atoms affected the development of the atomic model?

Physics
1 answer:
zaharov [31]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:Competing explanations' experiments on atoms gave a perfect modal of an atom

Explanation

There is a long story of atom. Different scientist gave different theories related to atomic modal but no one individually gave a perfect modal they perfect each other work and finally we got a perfect modal of atom.

Here is a short story of atom

in 400 B.C.E, Democritus was the first philosopher who gave the concept of atom. He believes that everything is made up of tiny spheres  and these spheres are known as atoms.

in 1803, Dalton said that atoms of an element are similar. For example all atoms of carbon are similar.

in 1904 J. J. Thomson proposed that atom is sphere in which positively charged matter is filled and electrons are randomly scattered in that positively charged matter.

in 1911, Rutherford gave the concept of nucleus he believed that at the center of atoms all positively charged  particles are present and this center is known as nucleus. He said that negatively charge electrons revolves around the nucleus in particular orbit.

In 1913, Niels Bohr gave a new model he believes that atomic model is similar to planetary modal. He believed that the electrons in an atom revolves around  the nucleus in sets of orbits in a similar manner like the planets revolves around the sun.

In 1919, Rutherford gave the concept of proton.  

In 1932, James Chadwick gives the concept of neutron.

In this way different scientist gave different theories related to atoms and finally they all gave a perfect modal of atom.

You might be interested in
The invention of the microscope made it possible for people to discover
sineoko [7]
The answer is D. They already knew about animals, plants and skin.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How long will a radioactive isotope decay?
fiasKO [112]

Answer:

c - until it becomes a different, stable element

Explanation:

found it somewhere else than brainly you're welcome :)

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
DESPERATE WILL GIBE BRAINLIST AND THANKS
const2013 [10]

Answer:

True

Radiometric dating is a process of identifying the age of a material based on known half-lives of decaying radioactive materials found in both organic and inorganic objects. Radiometric dating is often used to determine the age of rocks, bones, and ancient materials.

4 0
3 years ago
Is gravitational pull strengthened by distance?
topjm [15]

I'm not sure but I think that if objects are closer (less distant), than the gravitational pull is stronger. I'm sorry if I couldn't really help I remember learning about this kind of.

5 0
3 years ago
A polarized light that has an intensity I0 = 52.0 W/m² is incident on four polarizing disks whose planes are parallel and center
IceJOKER [234]

Answer:

The transmitted intensity through all polarizers = 34.73

Explanation:

Given :

Incident intensity = 52 W/m^2

Angle between the transmission axis and polarizer optic axis = 18°

According to the malus law, when unpolarized or polarized light passes through polarizing disk, the intensity of the transmitted light is directly proportional to the square of the cosine of angle between the transmission axis and polarizer optic axis.

∴ I = I' cos^2\alpha

Where I= transmitted intensity, I'= incident intensity, \alpha = angle between the transmission axis and polarizer optic axis.

Here, there are four polarizing disks so that.

from first disk,

∴ I₁ = 52 (cos)^2 18°

       = 52×0.904

       = 47.01

Now I₁  behave as an incident light for second polarizer so we only multiply

cos^218 term

so we write,

∴ I₂ = 47.01×0.904

      = 42.495

From third polarizer,

∴ I₃ = 42.495×0.904

       = 38.415

From forth polarizer,

∴ I₄ = 38.415×0.904

       = 34.73

Therefor, the the transmitted intensity through forth polarizer = 34.73 W/m^2.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why are the loops on a roller coaster tear-drop shaped instead of circular? It would be simpler to design & build tracks wit
    14·1 answer
  • When developing an experimental design which action could a scientist take to improve the quality of the results
    14·1 answer
  • A 9.6 cm diameter circular loop of wire is in a 1.10 T magnetic field perpendicular to the plane of the loop. The loop is remove
    8·2 answers
  • What is most likely the author’s motive for writing this article? to get you to buy sports products to get you to support nuclea
    7·2 answers
  • The Milky Way is the name of the _______ where the Earth is located. A. orbit B. universe C. galaxy D. solar system
    15·1 answer
  • When a wave hits a boundary, what determines how much is reflected and refracted?
    14·1 answer
  • If the mass of each object is the same, 18 g, which object will have the largest density? *
    11·1 answer
  • What is a measure of how much matter an object is made of?
    12·1 answer
  • wo charges are held stationary along the x-axis at the coordinates 6.0 cm for q1 = +8.00 pC and 12 cm for q2 = +5.00 pC. At what
    11·1 answer
  • What are the benefits and limitations to using heating curves to studying phase
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!