The cost of developing thermonuclear power with plasmabe defended because D. It can provide an inexpensive power source.
<h3>How did the
cost of developing t
hermonuclear power defended?</h3>
The cost of developing thermonuclear power defended becvause we can see in the paragraph how it was told that the generation of ths power can be donee through the understanding of the occurrence of plasmain nature,
It should be noted that this thermonuclear power with plasmabe posses the characteristics which make it to exist in the ionosphere, and it can be felt in the flames as well; as in the chemical and nuclearexplosions.
In conclusion the power can be seen as an inexpensive source power because the p[roduction of this power cn be found in most of the thing that can be found around us as discused above.
Therefore, option D is correct.
Read more about cost at:
brainly.com/question/25109150
#SPJ1
Answer:
I'm pretty sure its the 2nd one.
Give me some answer choices and i will be happy to help
A falling raindrop
Kinetic energy and potential energy are both applied when a body or object is falling.
Answer:
The separation distance between the slits is 16710.32 nm.
Explanation:
Given that,
Wavelength = 641 nm
Angle =4.4°
(a). We need to calculate the separation distance between the slits
Using formula of young's double slit
Where, d = the separation distance between the slits
m = number of order
=wavelength
Put the value into the formula
Hence, The separation distance between the slits is 16710.32 nm.
