Answer:
Explanation:
I hate these kinds of problems, luckily I can't understand how much the kinetic friction is for this , the words are all mixed around. and don't read well. Maybe this went through a translator program? My suggestion draw the free body diagram. so you can see where the forces are, and how they are acting. getting the free body diagram right.. usually makes these problems pretty straight forward. just do the steps and you get the answer.
Construct a vector diagram. It will be a right-angled triangle. One vector (the hypotenuse) represents the heading of the boat, one represents the current and one represents the resultant speed of the boat, which I'll call x. Their magnitudes are 20, 3 and x. Let the required angle = theta. We have:
<span>theta = arcsin(3/20) = approx. 8.63° </span>
<span>The boat should head against the current in a direction approx. 8.63° to the line connecting the dock with the point opposite, or approx. 81.37° to the shore line. </span>
<span>x = sqrt(20^2 - 3^2) </span>
<span>= sqrt(400 - 9) </span>
<span>= sqrt 391 </span>
<span>The boat's crossing time = </span>
<span>0.5 km/(sqrt 391 km/hr) </span>
<span>= (0.5/sqrt 391) hr </span>
<span>= approx. 0.025 hr </span>
<span>= approx. 91 seconds</span>
If you were to sit a hot cup of water out side it would frezze faster
Well, first of all, one who is sufficiently educated to deal with solving
this exercise is also sufficiently well informed to know that a weighing
machine, or "scale", should not be calibrated in units of "kg" ... a unit
of mass, not force. We know that the man's mass doesn't change,
and the spectre of a readout in kg that is oscillating is totally bogus.
If the mass of the man standing on the weighing machine is 60kg, then
on level, dry land on Earth, or on the deck of a ship in calm seas on Earth,
the weighing machine will display his weight as 588 newtons or as
132.3 pounds. That's also the reading as the deck of the ship executes
simple harmonic motion, at the points where the vertical acceleration is zero.
If the deck of the ship is bobbing vertically in simple harmonic motion with
amplitude of M and period of 15 sec, then its vertical position is
y(t) = y₀ + M sin(2π t/15) .
The vertical speed of the deck is y'(t) = M (2π/15) cos(2π t/15)
and its vertical acceleration is y''(t) = - (2πM/15) (2π/15) sin(2π t/15)
= - (4 π² M / 15²) sin(2π t/15)
= - 0.1755 M sin(2π t/15) .
There's the important number ... the 0.1755 M.
That's the peak acceleration.
From here, the problem is a piece-o-cake.
The net vertical force on the intrepid sailor ... the guy standing on the
bathroom scale out on the deck of the ship that's "bobbing" on the
high seas ... is (the force of gravity) + (the force causing him to 'bob'
harmonically with peak acceleration of 0.1755 x amplitude).
At the instant of peak acceleration, the weighing machine thinks that
the load upon it is a mass of 65kg, when in reality it's only 60kg.
The weight of 60kg = 588 newtons.
The weight of 65kg = 637 newtons.
The scale has to push on him with an extra (637 - 588) = 49 newtons
in order to accelerate him faster than gravity.
Now I'm going to wave my hands in the air a bit:
Apparent weight = (apparent mass) x (real acceleration of gravity)
(Apparent mass) = (65/60) = 1.08333 x real mass.
Apparent 'gravity' = 1.08333 x real acceleration of gravity.
The increase ... the 0.08333 ... is the 'extra' acceleration that's due to
the bobbing of the deck.
0.08333 G = 0.1755 M
The 'M' is what we need to find.
Divide each side by 0.1755 : M = (0.08333 / 0.1755) G
'G' = 9.0 m/s²
M = (0.08333 / 0.1755) (9.8) = 4.65 meters .
That result fills me with an overwhelming sense of no-confidence.
But I'm in my office, supposedly working, so I must leave it to others
to analyze my work and point out its many flaws.
In any case, my conscience is clear ... I do feel that I've put in a good
5-points-worth of work on this problem, even if the answer is wrong .
Answer:
1.2
Explanation:
2.0 mol O₂ × (3 mol CO₂ / 5 mol O₂) = 1.2 mol CO₂
