Answer:
Magnetic energy and electromagnetic energy form of potential energy followed by a form of kinetic energy.
(B) is correct option.
Explanation:
Given that,
Lists a form of potential energy followed by a form of kinetic energy
We know that,
Sound energy :
The movement of energy through object it is called sound energy. When a object produced vibration by force then it moves in wave.
Sound wave is example of kinetic energy.
Nuclear energy :
The store energy in the nucleus of the atom it is called nuclear energy. This energy released when occurs fusion and fission.
Nuclear energy is the example of potential energy
Magnetic energy :
Magnetic energy is a type of potential energy which is depend on distance and position in the magnetic field.
Electromagnetic energy :
Electromagnetic energy is light energy. it is type of kinetic energy.
Gravitational energy :
Gravitational energy is a type of potential energy. It is an energy related with gravity or gravitational force.
Elastic energy :
The store energy in elastic object it is called elastic energy. This energy is a type of potential energy.
Electrical energy :
The movement of electrons is called electrical energy. When electrons move through a wire then it is are called electricity. Electrical energy is type of kinetic energy.
Hence, Magnetic energy and electromagnetic energy form of potential energy followed by a form of kinetic energy.
(B) is correct option.
Answer: It would destroy the Earth's surface.
I remember reading this questions in What If? by Randall Munroe. Great book, I suggest you check it out. Anyway, the answer. The Earth is revolving as well as spinning on its axis at the same time. This basically means that thee atmosphere is also spinning at the same speed. But due to the frame of reference, we don't notice anything. If the Earth suddenly stops spinning, then the atmosphere, going according to the first law of motion will still be spinning at the same speed. This would produce supersonic winds at such a scale that it will be compared to an atomic explosion. Anything not in a nuclear bunker will probably be ripped apart by the force of the wind.
There is no right or wrong answer, your teacher wants you to support your own answer with points. As long as the reasons make logical sense you are fine.
I think they both have valid points. Their replies are both true, but from a buyer's perspective who would you purchase services from? You would get different answers depending on who you ask.
If you choose to go old school, obviously you get an actual photo that can be stored physically. This means it is a memory that can be preserved, and it might feel more nostalgic being able to touch the photo.
On the other hand, a digitally stored photo can be altered (photoshop), but it is forever as long as the internet still exists. A physical photo would fade with time, which doesn't happen with a digital photo.
It is definitely easier to argue that digital photography has more advantages (they do, it is why nobody uses film anymore)
Points you can consider:
Can be transferred to the other side of the world instantly
Ability to make copies and print as many photos as you want
Can be stored on cloud/devices and be like that forever
Compare them with film photography to give a more solid response.
The answer to your question 25.333333333
