Answer:
the empirical formula
Explanation:
I remember learning this last year.
Answer:
Option A. 2, 3, 2
Explanation:
We'll begin by balancing the equation. This can be achieved by doing the following:
Fe + Cl2 —> FeCl3
There are 2 atoms of Cl on the left side and 3 atoms on the right side. It can be balance by putting 3 in front of Cl2 and 2 in front of FeCl3 as shown below:
Fe + 3Cl2 —> 2FeCl3
There are 2 atoms of Fe on the right side and 1 atom on the left side. It can be balance by putting 2 in front of Fe as shown below:
2Fe + 3Cl2 —> 2FeCl3
Now the equation is balanced.
The coefficients are : 2, 3, 2
The standard Gibbs free energy of formation of ZnO from Zn is lower than that of CO2 from CO. Therefore, CO cannot reduce ZnO to Zn. Hence, Zn is not extracted from ZnO through reduction using CO
Answer:
74.0 g/mol
Explanation:
Step 1: Write the generic neutralization reaction
HA + NaOH ⇒ NaA + H₂O
Step 2: Calculate the reacting moles of NaOH
At the equivalence point, 33.83 mL of 0.115 M NaOH react.
0.03383 L × 0.115 mol/L = 3.89 × 10⁻³ mol
Step 3: Calculate the moles of HA that completely react with 3.89 × 10⁻³ moles of NaOH
The molar ratio of HA to NaOH is 1:1. The reacting moles of HA is 1/1 × 3.89 × 10⁻³ mol = 3.89 × 10⁻³ mol.
Step 4: Calculate the molar mass of the acid
3.89 × 10⁻³ moles of HA have a mass of 0.288 g.
M = 0.288 g / 3.89 × 10⁻³ mol = 74.0 g/mol
Explanation:
Half life of zero order and second order depends on the initial concentration. But as the given reaction slows down as the reaction proceeds, therefore, it must be second order reaction. This is because rate of reaction does not depend upon the initial concentration of the reactant.
a. As it is a second order reaction, therefore, doubling reactant concentration, will increase the rate of reaction 4 times. Therefore, the statement a is wrong.
b. Expression for second order reaction is as follows:
![\frac{1}{[A]} =\frac{1}{[A]_0} +kt](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B%5BA%5D%7D%20%3D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B%5BA%5D_0%7D%20%2Bkt)
the above equation can be written in the form of Y = mx + C
so, the plot between 1/[A] and t is linear. So the statement b is true.
c.
Expression for half life is as follows:
![t_{1/2}=\frac{1}{k[A]_0}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=t_%7B1%2F2%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bk%5BA%5D_0%7D)
As half-life is inversely proportional to initial concentration, therefore, increase in concentration will decrease the half life. Therefore statement c is wrong.
d.
Plot between A and t is exponential, therefore there is no constant slope. Therefore, the statement d is wrong
