1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Masteriza [31]
3 years ago
9

As part of an insurance company’s training program, participants learn how to conduct an analysis of clients’ insurability. The

goal is to have participants achieve a time in the range of 30 to 47 minutes. Test results for three participants were: Armand, a mean of 37.0 minutes and a standard deviation of 3.0 minutes; Jerry, a mean of 38.0 minutes and a standard deviation of 2.0 minutes; and Melissa, a mean of 38.5 minutes and a standard deviation of 2.9 minutes.
a.Which of the participants would you judge to be capable? (Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to 2 decimal places.)

Participants :

Armand: Cpk _____ Cp Capable ? (Click to select)NoYes

Jerry: Cpk _____ Capable ? (Click to select)YesNo

Melissa Cp ________ (Click to select)NoYes

b.Can the value of the Cpk exceed the value of Cp for a given participant?

yes or no
Engineering
1 answer:
sergij07 [2.7K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Part a

<em>The value of cp and cpk for Armand is 0.94 and 0.77 respectively. As both values are less than 1 so Armand is not capable.</em>

<em>The value of cp and cpk for Jerry is 1.42 and 1.33 respectively. As both values are more than 1 so Jerry is capable.</em>

<em>The value of cp and cpk for Melissa is 0.98 and 0.98 respectively. As both values are less than 1 so Melissa is not capable.</em>

Part b

<em>The value of cpk cannot be more than cp. It can at maximum equal to the value of the cp.</em>

Explanation:

Part a

As per the given data

Lower Tolerance Limit=LTL=30 min

Upper Tolerance Limit=UTL=47 min

The process capability ratio is given as

c_p=\frac{UTL-LTL}{6\sigma}

where σ is  the standard deviation .

The process capability index is given as

c_p_k=min(\frac{UTL-\mu}{3\sigma},\frac{\mu-LTL}{3\sigma})

where μ is the mean.

Armand

Now for Armand, μ is 37.0 , σ is 3.0.

c_p_{A}=\frac{UTL-LTL}{6\sigma}\\c_p_{A}=\frac{47-30}{6\times 3}\\c_p_{A}=0.94

c_p_k_{A}=min(\frac{UTL-\mu}{3\sigma},\frac{\mu-LTL}{3\sigma})\\c_p_k_{A}=min(\frac{47-37}{3\times 3},\frac{37-30}{3\times 3})\\c_p_k_{A}=min(1.1,0.77)\\c_p_k_{A}=0.77

<em>The value of cp and cpk for Armand is 0.94 and 0.77 respectively. As both values are less than 1 so Armand is not capable.</em>

Jerry

Now for Jerry, μ is 38.0 , σ is 2.0.

c_p_{J}=\frac{UTL-LTL}{6\sigma}\\c_p_{J}=\frac{47-30}{6\times 2}\\c_p_{J}=1.42

c_p_k_{J}=min(\frac{UTL-\mu}{3\sigma},\frac{\mu-LTL}{3\sigma})\\c_p_k_{J}=min(\frac{47-38}{3\times 2},\frac{38-30}{2\times 3})\\c_p_k_{J}=min(1.5,1.33)\\c_p_k_{J}=1.33

<em>The value of cp and cpk for Jerry is 1.42 and 1.33 respectively. As both values are more than 1 so Jerry is capable.</em>

Melissa

Now for Jerry, μ is 38.5 , σ is 2.9.

c_p_{M}=\frac{UTL-LTL}{6\sigma}\\c_p_{M}=\frac{47-30}{6\times 2.9}\\c_p_{M}=0.98

c_p_k_{M}=min(\frac{UTL-\mu}{3\sigma},\frac{\mu-LTL}{3\sigma})\\c_p_k_{M}=min(\frac{47-38.5}{3\times 2.9},\frac{38.5-30}{3\times 2.9})\\c_p_k_{M}=min(0.977,0.977)\\c_p_k_{M}=0.98

<em>The value of cp and cpk for Melissa is 0.98 and 0.98 respectively. As both values are less than 1 so Melissa is not capable.</em>

Part b

The value of cpk cannot be more than cp. It can at maximum equal to the value of the cp.

<em></em>

You might be interested in
The mechanical properties of a metal may be improved by incorporating fine particles of its oxide. Given that the moduli of elas
Sedaia [141]

Answer:

a) 254.6 GPa

b) 140.86 GPa

Explanation:

a) Considering the expression of rule of mixtures for upper-bound and calculating the modulus of elasticity for upper bound;

Ec(u) = EmVm + EpVp

To calculate the volume fraction of matrix, 0.63 is substituted for Vp in the equation below,

Vm + Vp = 1

Vm = 1 - 0.63

Vm = 0.37

In the first equation,

Where

Em = 68 GPa, Ep = 380 GPa, Vm = 0.37 and Vp = 0.63,

The modulus of elasticity upper-bound is,

Ec(u) = EmVm + EpVp

Ec(u) = (68 x 0.37) + (380 x 0.63)

Ec(u) = 254.6 GPa.

b) Considering the express of rule of mixtures for lower bound;

Ec(l) = (EmEp)/(VmEp + VpEm)

Substituting values into the equation,

Ec(l) = (68 x 380)/(0.37 x 380) + (0.63 x 68)

Ec(l) = 25840/183.44

Ec(l) = 140.86 GPa

6 0
3 years ago
g A food department is kept at -12oC by a refrigerator in an environment at 30oC. The total heat gain to the food department is
boyakko [2]

Answer:

a) \dot W = 0.417\,kW, b) COP_{R} = 2.198, c) Irreversible.

Explanation:

a) The power input required by the refrigerator is:

\dot W = \dot Q_{H} - \dot Q_{L}

\dot W = \left(4800\,\frac{kJ}{h} - 3300\,\frac{kJ}{h}\right)\cdot \left(\frac{1}{3600} \,\frac{h}{s} \right)

\dot W = 0.417\,kW

b) The Coefficient of Performance of the refrigerator is:

COP_{R} = \frac{\dot Q_{L}}{\dot W}

COP_{R} = \frac{3300\,\frac{kJ}{h} }{(0.417\,kW)\cdot \left(3600\,\frac{s}{h} \right)}

COP_{R} = 2.198

c) The maximum ideal Coefficient of Performance of the refrigeration is given by the inverse Carnot's Cycle:

COP_{R,ideal} = \frac{T_{L}}{T_{H}-T_{L}}

COP_{R,ideal} = \frac{261.15\,K}{303.15\,K - 261.15\,K}

COP_{R,ideal} = 6.218

The refrigeration cycle is irreversible, as COP_{R} < COP_{R,ideal}.

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is a advantage of a chain and sprocket over a pulley and belt system?
Tatiana [17]

Answer:

A) Cost

Explanation:

Chain drives have low maintenance cost.

3 0
3 years ago
Given the following MATLAB statement: ( 3 + 2 ) / 5 * 4 + 5 ^ 2 In what order will these operations be done?
Andrei [34K]

Answer:

first is the parentheses, (3+2)=5 next is the exponent 5^2=25, next is the division 5 / 5 = 1, then the multiplication 4*1=4 and then you add 4+25=29. so the answer is 29.

7 0
3 years ago
A pitfall cited in Section 1.10 is expecting to improve the overall performance of a computer by improving only one aspect of th
Oxana [17]

Answer:

a) For this case the new time to run the FP operation would be reduced 20% so that means 100-20% =80% from the original time

(1-0.2)*70 s =56s

The reduction on this case is 70-56 s=14s

And since the new total time would be given by 250-14=236 s

b) For this case the total time is reduced 20%  so that means that the new total time would be (1-0.2)=0.8 times the original total time (1-0.2) *250s =200 s

The original time for INT operations is calculated as:

250 = 70+85+40 +t_{INT}

t_{INT}=55s

For this part the only time that was changed is assumed the INT operations so then:

200 = 70+85+40 \Delta t_{INT}

And then: \Delta t_{INT}= 200-70-85-40=5 s

c) A reduction of the total time implies that the total time would be 205 s from the results above. And the time for FP is 70, for L/S is 85 and for INT operations is 55 s, so then if we add 70+85+55=210s, we see that 210>205 so then we cannot reduce the total time 20% just reducing the branch intructions.

Explanation:

From the info given we know that a computer running a program that requires 250 s, with 70 s spent executing FP instructions, 85 s executed L/S instructions and 40 s spent executing branch instructions.

Part 1

For this case the new time to run the FP operation would be reduced 20% so that means 100-20% =80% from the original time

(1-0.2)*70 s =56s

The reduction on this case is 70-56 s=14s

And since the new total time would be given by 250-14=236 s

Part 2

For this case the total time is reduced 20%  so that means that the new total time would be (1-0.2)=0.8 times the original total time (1-0.2) *250s =200 s

The original time for INT operations is calculated as:

250 = 70+85+40 +t_{INT}

t_{INT}=55s

For this part the only time that was changed is assumed the INT operations so then:

200 = 70+85+40 \Delta t_{INT}

And then: \Delta t_{INT}= 200-70-85-40=5 s

And we can quantify the decrease using the relative change:

\% Change = \frac{5s}{55 s} *100 = 9.09\% of reduction

Part 3

A reduction of the total time implies that the total time would be 205 s from the results above. And the time for FP is 70, for L/S is 85 and for INT operations is 55 s, so then if we add 70+85+55=210s, we see that 210>205 so then we cannot reduce the total time 20% just reducing the branch intructions.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A fluid flows steadily through a pipe with a uniform cross sectional area. The density of the fluid decreases to half its initia
    6·1 answer
  • An electronic device dissipating 25 W has a mass of 20 g and a specific heat of 850 J/kg·0K. The device is lightly used, and it
    9·1 answer
  • Sketch the velocity profile for laminar and turbulent flow.
    15·1 answer
  • Consider the following incomplete code segment, which is intended to print the sum of the digits in num. For example, when num i
    8·1 answer
  • Determine the average and rms values for the function, y(t)=25+10sino it over the time periods (a) 0 to 0.1 sec and (b) 0 to 1/3
    9·1 answer
  • The motion of a particle is defined by the relation x = t3 – 6t2 + 9t + 3, where x and t are expressed in feet and seconds, resp
    12·1 answer
  • Technician A says that in a worm gear steering system, most excessive steering free play is usually found in the gearbox. Techni
    13·1 answer
  • Please choose a specific type of stability or control surface (e.g., a canard) and explain how it is used, what it is used for,
    5·1 answer
  • Set the leak rate to zero and choose a non-zero value for the proportional feedback gain.Restart the simulation and turn on the
    5·1 answer
  • A high compression ratio may result in;
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!