If both bars are made of a good conductor, then their specific heat capacities must be different. If both are metals, specific heat capacities of different metals can vary by quite a bit, eg, both are in kJ/kgK, Potassium is 0.13, and Lithium is very high at 3.57 - both of these are quite good conductors.
If one of the bars is a good conductor and the other is a good insulator, then, after the surface application of heat, the temperatures at the surfaces are almost bound to be different. This is because the heat will be rapidly conducted into the body of the conducting bar, soon achieving a constant temperature throughout the bar. Whereas, with the insulator, the heat will tend to stay where it's put, heating the bar considerably over that area. As the heat slowly conducts into the bar, it will also start to cool from its surface, because it's so hot, and even if it has the same heat capacity as the other bar, which might be possible, it will eventually reach a lower, steady temperature throughout.
It is a solid when is frozen and a liquid when it melts
V=IR
Potential Difference (v)= Current (A) * Resistance (Ω)
As V increases, R also increases.
Answer:
0.5
Explanation:
D = M / V
You divide 300g by 600ml and you get 0.5
(✿◠‿◠)
Answer:
a) P=0.25x10^-7
b) R=B*N2*E
c) N=1.33x10^9 photons
Explanation:
a) the spontaneous emission rate is equal to:
1/tsp=1/3 ms
the stimulated emission rate is equal to:
pst=(N*C*o(v))/V
where
o(v)=((λ^2*A)/(8*π*u^2))g(v)
g(v)=2/(π*deltav)
o(v)=(λ^2)/(4*π*tp*deltav)
Replacing values:
o(v)=0.7^2/(4*π*3*50)=8.3x10^-19 cm^2
the probability is equal to:
P=(1000*3x10^10*8.3x10^-19)/(100)=0.25x10^-7
b) the rate of decay is equal to:
R=B*N2*E, where B is the Einstein´s coefficient and E is the energy system
c) the number of photons is equal to:
N=(1/tsp)*(V/C*o)
Replacing:
N=100/(3*3x10^10*8.3x10^-19)
N=1.33x10^9 photons
