In a way, all of the answers could be argued for (for example: in the first option: if the scientists' opinions are understood to be "informed understanding of the causes of events"), but one of the options is the best:
Scientific laws describe specific relationships in nature without offering
an explanation.
The reason why I think this is true is that many laws are phased too short and too concise to provide comprehensive explanations, instead they describe the relationships that must hold.
One of the options is pplain false:
Scientific laws explain why natural events occur. -"Scientific laws were theories that have been tested, proven, and adopted as laws." - since they are not adopted as laws.
Answer:
As a result, electrolyte solutions readily conduct electricity. ... By contrast, if a compound dissociates to a small extent, the solution will be a weak conductor of electricity; ... Typically, nonelectrolytes are primarily held together by covalent rather than ionic bonds. ... Explain why some molecules do not dissolve in water.
Answer:
Explanation:
From the information given:


no of moles of
= 0.01 L × 0.0010 mol/L
no of moles of
= 
no of moles of
= 0.01 L × 0.00010 mol/L
no of moles of
= 
Total volume = 0.02 L
![[Ca^{2+}}] = \dfrac{1\times10^{-5} \ mol}{0.02 \ L} \\ \\ \\ \[[Ca^{2+}}] = 0.0005 \ mol/L](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BCa%5E%7B2%2B%7D%7D%5D%20%3D%20%5Cdfrac%7B1%5Ctimes10%5E%7B-5%7D%20%5C%20mol%7D%7B0.02%20%5C%20L%7D%20%5C%5C%20%5C%5C%20%20%5C%5C%20%20%5C%5B%5BCa%5E%7B2%2B%7D%7D%5D%20%3D%200.0005%20%5C%20mol%2FL)
![[F^{-}] = \dfrac{(1\times 10^{-6} \ mol)}{0.02 \ L}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BF%5E%7B-%7D%5D%20%3D%20%5Cdfrac%7B%281%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-6%7D%20%5C%20mol%29%7D%7B0.02%20%5C%20L%7D)
![[F^{-}] = 5 \times 10^{-5} \ mol/L](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BF%5E%7B-%7D%5D%20%3D%205%20%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-5%7D%20%20%5C%20mol%2FL)
![Q = [Ca^{2+}][F^-]^2 \\ \\ Q = 0.0005 \times (5\times 10^{-5})^2 \\ \\ Q = 1.25 \times 10^{-12}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Q%20%3D%20%5BCa%5E%7B2%2B%7D%5D%5BF%5E-%5D%5E2%20%5C%5C%20%5C%5C%20Q%20%3D%200.0005%20%5Ctimes%20%285%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-5%7D%29%5E2%20%5C%5C%20%5C%5C%20Q%20%3D%201.25%20%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-12%7D)
Since Q<ksp, then there will no be any precipitation of CaF2
a. 381.27 m/s
b. the rate of effusion of sulfur dioxide = 2.5 faster than nitrogen triiodide
<h3>Further explanation</h3>
Given
T = 100 + 273 = 373 K
Required
a. the gas speedi
b. The rate of effusion comparison
Solution
a.
Average velocities of gases can be expressed as root-mean-square averages. (V rms)

R = gas constant, T = temperature, Mm = molar mass of the gas particles
From the question
R = 8,314 J / mol K
T = temperature
Mm = molar mass, kg / mol
Molar mass of Sulfur dioxide = 64 g/mol = 0.064 kg/mol

b. the effusion rates of two gases = the square root of the inverse of their molar masses:

M₁ = molar mass sulfur dioxide = 64
M₂ = molar mass nitrogen triodide = 395

the rate of effusion of sulfur dioxide = 2.5 faster than nitrogen triodide