Answer:
The acceleration of the object is 20 meters per second square = 20 m/s^2
Explanation:
Recall that acceleration is defined as the change in velocity divided the time it takes for the change. Therefore , if the object accelerates from rest (zero velocity) to 70 m/s , the change in velocity is (70 m/s - 0 m/s = 70 m/s)
which divided by the 3.5 seconds it took for the change, gives:
acceleration = (70 m/s / 3.5 s ) = 20 m/s^2
Horizontal distance covered by a projectile is X = Vix *T
where Vix is the initial horizontal component of velocity and T is time taken by the projectile
Vix = ViCos theta
In question they said that initial velocity and angle is same on earth and moon
so Vix would remains same
now let's see about time taken T
time taken to reach the highest point
Vfy = Viy +gt
at highest point vertical velocity become zero so Vfy =0
0 = Vi Sin theta + gt
t = Vi Sintheta /g
Total time taken to land will be twice of that
On earth
Te= 2t
Te = 2Sinθ/g
on moon g is one-sixth of g(earth)
Tm = 2Sinθ/(g/6)
Tm = 6(2Sinθ/g)
Tm = 6Te
so total time taken by the projectile on moon will be six times the time taken on earth
From first equation X = Vix*T
we can see that X will also be 6 times on moon than earth
so projectile will cover 6 times distance on moon than on earth
Answer:
A. It is always a positive force
Explanation:
Hooke's law describes the relation between an applied force and extension ability of an elastic material. The law states that provided the elastic limit, e, of a material is not exceeded, the force, F, applied is proportional to the extension, x, provided temperature is constant.
i.e F = - kx
where k is the constant of proportionality, and the minus sign implies that the force is a restoring force.
The applied force can either be compressing or stretching force.
I was about to say: because people generally get comfortable with
what they think they know, and don't like the discomfort of being told
that they have to change something they're comfortable with.
But then I thought about it a little bit more, and I have a different answer.
"Society" might initially reject a new scientific theory, because 'society'
is totally unequipped to render judgement of any kind regarding any
development in Science.
First of all, 'Society' is a thing that's made of a bunch of people, so it's
inherently unequipped to deal with scientific news. Anything that 'Society'
decides has a lot of the mob psychology in it, and a public opinion poll or
a popularity contest are terrible ways to evaluate a scientific discovery.
Second, let's face it. The main ingredient that comprises 'Society' ... people ...
are generally uneducated, unknowledgeable, unqualified, and clueless in the
substance, the history, and the methods of scientific inquiry and reporting.
There may be very good reasons that some particular a new scientific theory
should be rejected, or at least seriously questioned. But believe me, 'Society'
doesn't have them.
That's pretty much why.