<span><span>The Espionage Act of 1917
was created to forbid intrusion of military operations and military
recruitment. It was also intended to
stop insubordination in the military, and to check the assistance of enemies of
the United States during times of war. In 1919, the U.S. Supreme Court </span>solidly
declared through Schenck vs. United States that
the act did not disregard the freedom
of speech of those sentenced under its provisions. The case of Charles Schenck who was the
general secretary of the Executive Committee of the Socialist Party who
distributed leaflets exhorting men not to obey the draft because
they considered involuntary servitude.
Schenck and a fellow named were convicted because the court defended the
decision because the situation during times of war require stricter measures
compared to times of peace of the presence of dangerous forces.</span>
Answer:
I will explain him briefly about the residential schools
^_^
HOPE THIS HELPS YOU
Follw me = 10 thanks
Mark as brainliest = 10 thanks
1 thanks to me = 2 thanks
Answer:
Phages can also be categorized into three types according to their infection mechanism: (1) virulent phages always lyse the infected bacterial cell to release their progeny; (2) temperate phages can either enter the lytic cycle as virulent phages or enter the lysogenic cycle in which the phage genome is retained as.
Explanation:
hope it helps
good day ✌️
The correct answer is no.
Alisha was under no obligation to help Timmy, <em>there is no such thing like</em> <em>duty to rescue.</em> There is no legal requirement in the United States to help and rescue someone who is in danger. Even in extreme situation, when a person sees a person falling into a river for example, the witness of the situation is no obliged to assist with help.
There are some cases with some important exceptions: if the defendant created the peril he is obliged to come to the plaintiff's aid, if the defendant started to rescue the plaintiff, he must continue to do so, if the defendant is in a special relationship with the plaintiff ( teacher-student, worker-employer), he is under duty to rescue him.
Alisha was under no duty to inform Timmy's parents of the danger facing him <em>but she should have done it nevertheless.</em> She should at least have phoned them if she didn't have the time to stop by. She knew the boy well and she should have cared more. The need to help the boy should have come from her moral guidance and not as a sense of duty to be performed.
Answer:
Attention.
Explanation:
Devonia's problem is most likely caused by attention. Based on the details given in the scenario, it could be seen that Devonia craves the attention of craves the attention of her teaching assistant such that she is either irritated or comfortable when she isn't being attented to. Additionally, her personal assistant's treatment of her anytime she exhibits such attitude also has her having an increased desire for attention due to the warmth treatment she's given once she displays her dissatisfaction.