Answer:
proportional to the current in the wire and inversely proportional to the distance from the wire.
Explanation:
The magnetic field produced by a long, straight current-carrying wire is given by:
where
is the vacuum permeability
I is the current intensity in the wire
r is the distance from the wire
From the formula, we notice that:
- The magnitude of the magnetic field is directly proportional to I, the current
- The magnitude of the magnetic field is inversely proportional to the distance from the wire, r
Therefore, correct option is
proportional to the current in the wire and inversely proportional to the distance from the wire.
Answer:
Explanation:
Newton's Gravitation Law
where G is a constant, M and M the masses e d the distance betwen masses.
Answer:
1keff=1k1+1k2
see further explanation
Explanation:for clarification
Show that the effective force constant of a series combination is given by 1keff=1k1+1k2. (Hint: For a given force, the total distance stretched by the equivalent single spring is the sum of the distances stretched by the springs in combination. Also, each spring must exert the same force. Do you see why?
From Hooke's law , we know that the force exerted on an elastic object is directly proportional to the extension provided that the elastic limit is not exceeded.
Now the spring is in series combination
F
e
F=ke
k=f/e.........*
where k is the force constant or the constant of proportionality
k=f/e
............................1
also for effective force constant
divide all through by extension
1) Total force is
Ft=F1+F2
Ft=k1e1+k2e2
F = k(e1+e2) 2)
Since force on the 2 springs is the same, so
k1e1=k2e2
e1=F/k1 and e2=F/k2,
and e1+e2=F/keq
Substituting e1 and e2, you get
1/keq=1/k1+1/k2
Hint: For a given force, the total distance stretched by the equivalent single spring is the sum of the distances stretched by the springs in combination.
I know i did part a correctly. heres what i did: momentum is conserved: m1 * u - m2 * u = m2 * v or (m1 - m2) * u = m2 * v Also, for an elastic head-on collision, we know that the relative velocity of approach = relative velocity of separation (from conservation of energy), or, for this problem, 2u = v Then (m1 - m2) * u = m2 * 2u m1 - m2 = 2 * m2 m1 = 3 * m2 m1 is the sphere that remained at rest (hence its absence from the RHS), so m2 = 0.3kg / 3 m2 = 0.1 kg b) this part confuses me, heres what i did (m1 - m2) * u = m2 * v (.3kg - .1kg)(2.0m/s) = .1kg * v .4 kg = .1 v v = 4 m/s What my teacher did: (.3g - .1g) * 2.0m/s = (.3g + .1g) * v I understand the left hand side but i dont get the right hand side. Why is m1 added to m2 when m1 is at rest which makes its v = zero?? v = +1.00m/s since the answer is positive, what does that mean? Also, if v was -1.00m/s what would that mean? thanks!
<span>Reference https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/elastic-collision-with-conservation-of-momentum-problem.651261...</span>
Voltage = Current (I) × Resistance (R)
V = 10 × 28.5 = 285v
