Answer:
c. Solar eclipses would be much more frequent.
Explanation:
The <u>ecliptic plane</u> is the apparent orbit that the sun describes around the earth (although it is the earth that orbits the sun), is the path the sun follows in earth's sky.
A <u>solar eclipse</u> occurs when the moon gets between the earth and the sun, so a shadow is cast on the earth because the light from the sun is blocked.
The reason why solar eclipses are not very frequent is because the moon's orbital plane is not in the same plane as the orbit of the earth around the sun, but rather that it is somewhat inclined with respect to it.
So <u>if both orbits were aligned, the moon would interpose between the sun and the earth more frequently, producing more solar eclipses.</u>
So, if the moon's orbital plane were exacly the same as the ecliptic plane solar eclipses would be more frequent.
the answer is: c.
The magnitude of the electric field for 60 cm is 6.49 × 10^5 N/C
R(radius of the solid sphere)=(60cm)( 1m /100cm)=0.6m

Since the Gaussian sphere of radius r>R encloses all the charge of the sphere similar to the situation in part (c), we can use Equation (6) to find the magnitude of the electric field:

Substitute numerical values:

The spherical Gaussian surface is chosen so that it is concentric with the charge distribution.
As an example, consider a charged spherical shell S of negligible thickness, with a uniformly distributed charge Q and radius R. We can use Gauss's law to find the magnitude of the resultant electric field E at a distance r from the center of the charged shell. It is immediately apparent that for a spherical Gaussian surface of radius r < R the enclosed charge is zero: hence the net flux is zero and the magnitude of the electric field on the Gaussian surface is also 0 (by letting QA = 0 in Gauss's law, where QA is the charge enclosed by the Gaussian surface).
Learn more about Gaussian sphere here:
brainly.com/question/2004529
#SPJ4
Answer:
Option C is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Considering vertical motion of ball:-
Initial velocity, u = 2 m/s
Acceleration , a = 9.81 m/s²
Displacement, s = 40 m
We have equation of motion s= ut + 0.5 at²
Substituting
s= ut + 0.5 at²
40 = 2 x t + 0.5 x 9.81 x t²
4.9t² + 2t - 40 = 0
t = 2.66 s or t = -3.06 s
So, time is 2.66 s.
Option C is the correct answer.
Answer:
0.687 m/s
Explanation:
Initial energy = final energy
1/2 mu² = mgh + 1/2 mv²
1/2 u² = gh + 1/2 v²
Given u = 2.00 m/s, g = 9.8 m/s², and h = 0.180 m:
1/2 (2.00 m/s)² = (9.8 m/s²) (0.180 m) + 1/2 v²
v = 0.687 m/s
Answer:
10
Explanation:
This is tough. The last number 0.2 has only one significant figure. So while the sum of all the numbers is 12.3, you must only leave one sig figure. Rounding to the tenths gives 10.