1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jeyben [28]
2 years ago
6

1s^2 2s^2 2p^6 3s^2 3p^6 how many unpaired electrons are in the atom represented by the electron configuration above?

Chemistry
2 answers:
Sedbober [7]2 years ago
5 0
It's a combination of factors:
Less electrons paired in the same orbital
More electrons with parallel spins in separate orbitals
Pertinent valence orbitals NOT close enough in energy for electron pairing to be stabilized enough by large orbital size
DISCLAIMER: Long answer, but it's a complicated issue, so... :)
A lot of people want to say that it's because a "half-filled subshell" increases stability, which is a reason, but not necessarily the only reason. However, for chromium, it's the significant reason.
It's also worth mentioning that these reasons are after-the-fact; chromium doesn't know the reasons we come up with; the reasons just have to be, well, reasonable.
The reasons I can think of are:
Minimization of coulombic repulsion energy
Maximization of exchange energy
Lack of significant reduction of pairing energy overall in comparison to an atom with larger occupied orbitals
COULOMBIC REPULSION ENERGY
Coulombic repulsion energy is the increased energy due to opposite-spin electron pairing, in a context where there are only two electrons of nearly-degenerate energies.
So, for example...
↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−− is higher in energy than
↑
↓
−−−−−

↓
↑
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−
To make it easier on us, we can crudely "measure" the repulsion energy with the symbol
Π
c
. We'd just say that for every electron pair in the same orbital, it adds one
Π
c
unit of destabilization.
When you have something like this with parallel electron spins...
↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−
It becomes important to incorporate the exchange energy.
EXCHANGE ENERGY
Exchange energy is the reduction in energy due to the number of parallel-spin electron pairs in different orbitals.
It's a quantum mechanical argument where the parallel-spin electrons can exchange with each other due to their indistinguishability (you can't tell for sure if it's electron 1 that's in orbital 1, or electron 2 that's in orbital 1, etc), reducing the energy of the configuration.
For example...
↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−− is lower in energy than
↑
↓
−−−−−

↓
↑
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−
To make it easier for us, a crude way to "measure" exchange energy is to say that it's equal to
Π
e
for each pair that can exchange.
So for the first configuration above, it would be stabilized by
Π
e
(
1
↔
2
), but the second configuration would have a
0
Π
e
stabilization (opposite spins; can't exchange).
PAIRING ENERGY
Pairing energy is just the combination of both the repulsion and exchange energy. We call it
Π
, so:
Π
=
Π
c
+
Π
e

Inorganic Chemistry, Miessler et al.
Inorganic Chemistry, Miessler et al.
Basically, the pairing energy is:
higher when repulsion energy is high (i.e. many electrons paired), meaning pairing is unfavorable
lower when exchange energy is high (i.e. many electrons parallel and unpaired), meaning pairing is favorable
So, when it comes to putting it together for chromium... (
4
s
and
3
d
orbitals)
↑
↓
−−−−−
↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−
compared to
↑
↓
−−−−−
↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−
is more stable.
For simplicity, if we assume the
4
s
and
3
d
electrons aren't close enough in energy to be considered "nearly-degenerate":
The first configuration has
Π
=
10
Π
e
.
(Exchanges:
1
↔
2
,
1
↔
3
,
1
↔
4
,
1
↔
5
,
2
↔
3
,

2
↔
4
,
2
↔
5
,
3
↔
4
,
3
↔
5
,
4
↔
5
)
The second configuration has
Π
=
Π
c
+
6
Π
e
.
(Exchanges:
1
↔
2
,
1
↔
3
,
1
↔
4
,
2
↔
3
,
2
↔
4
,
3
↔
4
)
Technically, they are about
3.29 eV
apart (Appendix B.9), which means it takes about
3.29 V
to transfer a single electron from the
3
d
up to the
4
s
.
We could also say that since the
3
d
orbitals are lower in energy, transferring one electron to a lower-energy orbital is helpful anyways from a less quantitative perspective.
COMPLICATIONS DUE TO ORBITAL SIZE
Note that for example,
W
has a configuration of
[
X
e
]
5
d
4
6
s
2
, which seems to contradict the reasoning we had for
Cr
, since the pairing occurred in the higher-energy orbital.
But, we should also recognize that
5
d
orbitals are larger than
3
d
orbitals, which means the electron density can be more spread out for
W
than for
Cr
, thus reducing the pairing energy
Π
.
That is,
Π
W
Tanzania [10]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

0 unpaired

Explanation:

the electron configuration of 1s^2 2s^2 2p^6 3s^2 3p^6, can also be written in noble gas configuration as [Ne] 3s^2 3p^6 which translates to the element Argon ( Ar ). Since the outer shell is full with 8 valence electrons, there is no lone electron so all elections are paired.

You might be interested in
what force is necessary for a zookeeper to lift a sedated lion with a total mass of 175 kg with an upward acceleration of .65 m/
BabaBlast [244]
I dont know how to do this but i think maybe you would probably subtract.....

4 0
3 years ago
Flow of heat energy through liquids and<br> gases
riadik2000 [5.3K]
Answer : I hope this helps !

Liquids and gases are fluids because they can be made to flow. The particles in these fluids can move from place to place. Convection occurs when particles with a lot of heat energy in a liquid or gas move and take the place of particles with less heat energy.
6 0
3 years ago
DONT SKIPP What type of bond will occur between lithium and bromine?
den301095 [7]
An ionic bond is formed between lithium and bromine.
4 0
3 years ago
List the major types of intermolecular forces in order of increasing strength. Is there some overlap? That is, can the strongest
Doss [256]

Answer:

Failed to upload, Please Retry

Explanation:

Failed to upload, Please Retry

6 0
3 years ago
What was Johann Dobereiner’s contribution to the development of the periodic table?
umka21 [38]
<span>he introduced his law of triads. each triad was a group of three elements</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is a common groundwater contaminant?
    6·2 answers
  • All of the cells in the body need oxygen. Hemoglobin molecules in red blood cells transport oxygen through the bloodstream. Oxyg
    5·1 answer
  • Characteristic of a chemical compound
    13·1 answer
  • Be sure to answer all parts.Classify each nitrogen-containing functional group in the anesthetic lidocaine according to whether
    10·1 answer
  • Which phenomena support only the particle theory of light? Check all that apply. reflection
    12·2 answers
  • For Carbon, which sublevel has unpaired electrons?<br> ASAP
    6·1 answer
  • What is the electron configuration of (Si) in noble gas notation
    9·2 answers
  • 1. Why has hydroelectricity's share of total U.S. electricity generation have decreased over time?
    8·2 answers
  • If I have 7.7 moles of gas at a pressure of 9.12 kPa and a temperature of 56 °C,
    8·1 answer
  • ME<br> When an acid and base combine, what is one property of the product?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!