Answer:
32.4 mol
Explanation:
Given data:
Number of moles of C atom present = ?
Number of moles of glucose = 5.4 mol
Solution:
Glucose formula = C₆H₁₂O₆
There are 6 moles of C atoms are present in one mole of glucose.
In 5.4 moles of glucose:
5.4 mol × 6 = 32.4 mol
The molar solubility is 7.4×
M and the solubility is 7.4× g/L .
Calculation ,
The dissociation of silver bromide is given as ,
→ 
+ 
S
- S S
Ksp = [ ] [ ] = [S] [ S ] = 
S = √ Ksp = √ 5. 5×
= 7.4×
The solubility =7.4× g/L
The molar solubility is the solubility of one mole of the substance.
Since , one mole of is dissociates and form one mole of each and ion . So, solubility is equal to molar solubility but unit is different.
Molar solubility = 7.4× mol/L = 7.4× M
To learn more about molar solubility ,
brainly.com/question/16243859
#SPJ4
Explanation:
Given that:
Distance traveled = 3150m
Average speed = 350m/min
Suggested speed = 375m/min
Unknown:
Time = ?
Solution:
Speed is the rate of change of distance with time.
it is mathematically expressed as;
speed = 
Initial time using speed 350m/min can be calculated by making time the subject of the formula;
time taken = 
time taken at speed of speed of 350m/min = 
= 9min
to seconds = 9 x 60 = 540 seconds
time taken at speed of 375m/min = 
= 8.4min
to seconds = 8.4 x 60 = 504 seconds.
It could have taken 504 seconds sooner saving 36 seconds.
learn more:
Speed brainly.com/question/10177389
#learnwithBrainly
1. The reactivity among the alkali metals increases as you go down the group due to the decrease in the effective nuclear charge from the increased shielding by the greater number of electrons. The greater the atomic number, the weaker the hold on the valence electron the nucleus has, and the more easily the element can lose the electron. Conversely, the lower the atomic number, the greater pull the nucleus has on the valence electron, and the less readily would the element be able to lose the electron (relatively speaking). Thus, in the first set comprising group I elements, sodium (Na) would be the least likely to lose its valence electron (and, for that matter, its core electrons).
2. The elements in this set are the group II alkaline earth metals, and they follow the same trend as the alkali metals. Of the elements here, beryllium (Be) would have the highest effective nuclear charge, and so it would be the least likely to lose its valence electrons. In fact, beryllium has a tendency not to lose (or gain) electrons, i.e., ionize, at all; it is unique among its congeners in that it tends to form covalent bonds.
3. While the alkali and alkaline earth metals would lose electrons to attain a noble gas configuration, the group VIIA halogens, as we have here, would need to gain a valence electron for an full octet. The trends in the group I and II elements are turned on their head for the halogens: The smaller the atomic number, the less shielding, and so the greater the pull by the nucleus to gain a valence electron. And as the atomic number increases (such as when you go down the group), the more shielding there is, the weaker the effective nuclear charge, and the lesser the tendency to gain a valence electron. Bromine (Br) has the largest atomic number among the halogens in this set, so an electron would feel the smallest pull from a bromine atom; bromine would thus be the least likely here to gain a valence electron.
4. The pattern for the elements in this set (the group VI chalcogens) generally follows that of the halogens. The greater the atomic number, the weaker the pull of the nucleus, and so the lesser the tendency to gain electrons. Tellurium (Te) has the highest atomic number among the elements in the set, and so it would be the least likely to gain electrons.
