No! That’s why they’re called theories. Most of them have a lot of facts to back it up however the theories themselves are either proven or just hypothetical.
Specificity. It’s really loose to say that something is fast, since speed can be scalarly linked and relative. I could say that both a car on the highway is fast, but so is the speed of light. The actual speed of something helps to do away with the arbitrary nature of using “fast” and “slow”; however, we’re still at step one of the person who is receiving the information is unfamiliar with the scale that the actual speed is defined in.
The question is missing the data sets.
This is the complete question:
A single penny has a mass of 2.5 g. Abbie and James
each measure the mass of a penny multiple times. Which statement about
these data sets is true?
O Abbie's measurements are both more accurate
and more precise than James'.
O Abbie's measurements are more accurate,
but less precise, than James'.
O Abbie's measurements are more precise,
but less accurate, than James'.
O Abbie’s measurements are both less
accurate and less precise than James'.
Penny masses (g)
Abbie’s data
2.5, 2.4, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.6
James’ data
2.4, 3.0, 3.3, 2.2, 2.9, 3.8, 2.9
Answer: first option, Abbie's measurements are both more accurate
and more precise than James'.
Explanation:
1) To answer this question, you first must understand the difference between precision and accuracy.
<span>Accuracy is how close the data are to the true or accepted value.
</span>
<span>Precision is how close are the data among them, this is the reproducibility of the values.</span>
Then, you can measure the accuracy by comparing the means (averages) with the actual mass of a penny 2.5 g.
And you measure the precision by comparing a measure of spread, as it can be the standard deviation.
2) These are the calculations:
Abbie’s data
Average: ∑ of the values / number of values
Average = [2.5 + 2.4 + 2.3 + 2.4 + 2.5 + 2.6 + 2.6 ] / 7 = 2.47 ≈ 2.5
Standard deviation: √ [ ∑ (x - mean)² / (n - 1) ] = 0.11
James’ data
Average = [2.4 + 3.0 + 3.3 + 2.2 + 2.9 + 3.8 + 2.9] / 7 = 2.56 ≈ 2.6
Standard deviation = 0.53
3) Conclusions:
1) The average of Abbie's data are closer to the accepted value 2.5g, so they are more accurate.
2) The standard deviation of Abbie's data is smaller than that of Jame's data, so the Abbie's data are more precise.
Answer : The mass of nitric acid is, 214.234 grams.
Solution : Given,
Moles of nitric acid = 3.4 moles
Molar mass of nitric acid = 63.01 g/mole
Formula used :
Now put all the given values in this formula, we get the mass of nitric acid.
Therefore, the mass of nitric acid is, 214.234 grams.
