Answer:
1st one.
Explanation:
I think that because they the one who is going to get a ticket and also you will not gonna get in a car accident.
Answer:
b) The null hypothesis should be rejected.
Explanation:
The null hypothesis is that the mean shear strength of spot welds is at least
3.1 MPa
H0: u ≥3.1 MPa against the claim Ha: u< 3.1 MPa
The alternate hypothesis is that the mean shear strength of spot welds is less than 3.1 MPa.
This is one tailed test
The critical region Z(0.05) < ± 1.645
The Sample mean= x`= 3.07
The number of welds= n= 15
Standard Deviation= s= 0.069
Applying z test
z= x`-u/s/√n
z= 3.07-3.1/0.069/√15
z= -0.03/0.0178
z= -1.68
As the calculated z= -1.68 falls in the critical region Z(0.05) < ± 1.645 the null hypothesis is rejected and the alternate hypothesis is accepted that the mean shear strength of spot welds is less than 3.1 MPa
Answer:
a)
, b) 
Explanation:
a) The counterflow heat exchanger is presented in the attachment. Given that cold water is an uncompressible fluid, specific heat does not vary significantly with changes on temperature. Let assume that cold water has the following specific heat:

The effectiveness of the counterflow heat exchanger as a function of the capacity ratio and NTU is:

The capacity ratio is:



Heat exchangers with NTU greater than 3 have enormous heat transfer surfaces and are not justified economically. Let consider that
. The efectiveness of the heat exchanger is:


The real heat transfer rate is:




The exit temperature of the hot fluid is:




The log mean temperature difference is determined herein:



The heat transfer surface area is:



Length of a single pass counter flow heat exchanger is:



b) Given that tube wall is very thin, inner and outer heat transfer areas are similar and, consequently, the cold side heat transfer coefficient is approximately equal to the hot side heat transfer coefficient.

Answer:
Do you need shown work for all of this?